Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.
Williges, Ben; Wesarg, Thomas; Jung, Lorenz; Geven, Leontien I; Radeloff, Andreas; Jürgens, Tim.
Afiliación
  • Williges B; 1 Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Wesarg T; 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany.
  • Jung L; 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany.
  • Geven LI; 3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Radeloff A; 3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany.
  • Jürgens T; 1 Medical Physics and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Germany.
Trends Hear ; 23: 2331216519858311, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31364496
ABSTRACT
This study compared spatial speech-in-noise performance in two cochlear implant (CI) patient groups bimodal listeners, who use a hearing aid contralaterally to support their impaired acoustic hearing, and listeners with contralateral normal hearing, i.e., who were single-sided deaf before implantation. Using a laboratory setting that controls for head movements and that simulates spatial acoustic scenes, speech reception thresholds were measured for frontal speech-in-stationary noise from the front, the left, or the right side. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was then extracted from speech reception thresholds for monaural and binaural listening. SRM was found to be significantly lower in bimodal CI than in CI single-sided deaf listeners. Within each listener group, the SRM extracted from monaural listening did not differ from the SRM extracted from binaural listening. In contrast, a normal-hearing control group showed a significant improvement in SRM when using two ears in comparison to one. Neither CI group showed a binaural summation effect; that is, their performance was not improved by using two devices instead of the best monaural device in each spatial scenario. The results confirm a "listening with the better ear" strategy in the two CI patient groups, where patients benefited from using two ears/devices instead of one by selectively attending to the better one. Which one is the better ear, however, depends on the spatial scenario and on the individual configuration of hearing loss.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción del Habla / Implantes Cocleares Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Trends Hear Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción del Habla / Implantes Cocleares Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Trends Hear Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania