Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Renal Transplantation in High Immunological Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience.
Alpay, Nadir; Özçelik, Ümit; Eren, Eryigit; Uslu, Bora.
Afiliación
  • Alpay N; Department of Nephrology, Istanbul Aydin University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: drnadiralpay@hotmail.com.
  • Özçelik Ü; Department of General Surgery, Istanbul Aydin University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Eren E; Department of General Surgery, Istinye University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Uslu B; Department of Nephrology, Istinye University Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Transplant Proc ; 51(7): 2298-2301, 2019 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31405734
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Renal transplantation (RT) in high-risk patients is increasingly performed due to an inadequate organ pool and increased rate of RT after a failed transplantation. Safety and prognosis of RT in such patients with high risk is an ongoing debate. Herein we aimed to present our single-center experience on RT of high-risk patients.

METHODS:

A total of 89 consecutive RT patients were included into this study in a 10-month period. Patients were divided into 3 groups the low-risk group (n = 47) with negative panel reactive antibody (PRA), medium-risk group (n = 18) with positive PRA but mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) < 2000, and high-risk group (n = 24) with positive PRA and MFI >2000 or donor specific antibody (DSA) positivity. Groups were compared in terms of demographic features, serum creatinine levels, acute rejection rates, delayed graft function (DGF), and patient or graft loss.

RESULTS:

Age of the recipients were similar between the groups. Desensitization (7% vs 11% vs 42%, respectively, in low-, medium-, and high-risk groups; P = .001), plasmapheresis (6% vs 11% vs 46%, respectively, P < .001), and rituximab treatments (0% vs 0% vs 25%, respectively, P < .001) were significantly more frequently performed in high-risk patients. Serum creatinine levels at 1 month and 6 months after RT were similar between the groups (P = .43 and P = .71, respectively). Rates of acute rejection (6% vs 6% vs 16%, respectively, P = .52) and DGF (9% vs 11% vs 29%, respectively, P = .15) were similar between the groups. Frequencies of loss of patient or graft were also similar (0% vs 6% vs 4%, P = .15).

CONCLUSION:

RT may be successfully performed in high-risk patients without an increase in the risk of acute rejection, DGF, or patient/graft loss.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desensibilización Inmunológica / Trasplante de Riñón / Plasmaféresis / Rituximab / Rechazo de Injerto Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Desensibilización Inmunológica / Trasplante de Riñón / Plasmaféresis / Rituximab / Rechazo de Injerto Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article