Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Line-of-sight in operating a small unmanned aerial vehicle: How far can a quadcopter fly in line-of-sight?
Li, Kai Way; Jia, Huiqiao; Peng, Lu; Gan, Lang.
Afiliación
  • Li KW; School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China; School of Safety & Environmental Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China. Electronic address: kai@chu.edu.tw.
  • Jia H; School of Safety & Environmental Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China.
  • Peng L; Department of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tang, Hong Kong.
  • Gan L; School of Safety & Environmental Engineering, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China.
Appl Ergon ; 81: 102898, 2019 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31422266
A field study was conducted to investigate the probabilities of human participants to detect a small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) at a certain distance. A Phantom 4 quadcopter was remotely controlled to hover at one of the 32 pre-determined locations in the air. Thirty-two participants on the ground were requested to judge if they could see the quadcopter on a four-point scale: 1. definitely yes, 2. probably yes, 3. probably no, and 4. definitely no. The participants also responded whether they could hear the quadcopter on the same four-point scale. Logistic regression models were established to estimate the probability of detecting the quadcopter in the air, both visually and auditory. When navigating a quadcopter flying away from the operator, the sound stimulus diminished and then disappeared earlier than that of the sight of the quadcopter. The results of the study indicated that the probability of visual detection of the quadcopter at a distance of 300 m was approximately 0.3. When adopting a 50% probability of visual detection and the "definitely or probably yes" criterion, the estimated distance of line-of-sight was 245 m. The corresponding visual angle was 0.065°. The information in this study is valuable for drone operators, operator training institutes, and drone designers. The aviation authorities may also consider revising the codes or regulations for small UAV operation based on our findings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción Auditiva / Aviación / Percepción Visual / Aeronaves / Percepción de Distancia Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Appl Ergon Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Percepción Auditiva / Aviación / Percepción Visual / Aeronaves / Percepción de Distancia Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Appl Ergon Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido