Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integrating Family Caregiver Support Into a Gynecologic Oncology Practice: An ASCO Quality Training Program Project.
Campbell, Grace B; Boisen, Michelle M; Hand, Lauren C; Lee, Young Ji; Lersch, Nora; Roberge, Mary C; Suchonic, Barbara; Thomas, Teresa H; Donovan, Heidi S.
Afiliación
  • Campbell GB; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Boisen MM; UPMC GynOnc Family CARE Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Hand LC; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Lee YJ; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Lersch N; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Roberge MC; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Suchonic B; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Thomas TH; UPMC GynOnc Family CARE Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Donovan HS; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center at Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 16(3): e264-e270, 2020 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31496394
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

A needs assessment of family caregivers (CGs) in our gynecologic oncology clinic found that 50% of CGs report nine or more distressing unmet needs, but only 19% of patients had a documented CG. We conducted an ASCO Quality Training Program project with the following

aims:

(1) to identify and document primary CGs for 85% of patients within two clinic visits of a gynecologic cancer diagnosis, and (2) assess the needs of and provide interventions to 75% of identified family CGs.

METHODS:

Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology and tools endorsed by the ASCO Quality Training Program were used. An interprofessional team reviewed baseline data (ie, any mention of a family CG in the electronic health record visit note; CG distress survey), defined the problem and project aims, created process maps, and identified root causes of poor CG identification and documentation. Eight successive PDSA cycles were implemented between October 2018 and March 2019 to address identified root causes.

RESULTS:

For aim 1, CG identification increased from 19% at baseline to 57% postimplementation, whereas for aim 2, assessment improved from 28% at baseline to 60% postimplementation. Results fell somewhat short of initial goals, but they represent an important initial improvement in care. The core team has begun additional PDSA cycles to improve CG identification rates and extend the momentum of the project.

CONCLUSION:

This project demonstrated that a CG assessment protocol can be implemented in a large, academic, gynecologic oncology clinic. Additional efforts to integrate CG identification, assessment, and intervention more fully within the clinic and electronic health record are under way.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: JCO Oncol Pract Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Panamá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: JCO Oncol Pract Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Panamá