Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Survival Benefits of Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in A Clinical Real-World Cohort.
Kordes, Maximilian; Yu, Jingru; Malgerud, Oscar; Gustafsson Liljefors, Maria; Löhr, J -Matthias.
Afiliación
  • Kordes M; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. maximilian.kordes@ki.se.
  • Yu J; Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Cancer Division, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. maximilian.kordes@ki.se.
  • Malgerud O; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. jingru.yu@ki.se.
  • Gustafsson Liljefors M; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. o_malgerud@hotmail.com.
  • Löhr J-; Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Cancer Division, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. maria.gustafsson-liljefors@sll.se.
Cancers (Basel) ; 11(9)2019 Sep 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31500236
ABSTRACT
Clinical outcomes of chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a real-world setting might differ from outcomes in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Here we show in a single-institution cohort of 595 patients that median overall survival (OS) of patients who received gemcitabine alone (n = 185; 6.6 months (95% CI; 5.5-7.7)) was the same as in pivotal RCTs. Gemcitabine/capecitabine (n = 60; 10.6 months (95% CI; 7.8-13.3)) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (n = 66; 9.8 months (95% CI; 7.9-11.8)) resulted in a longer median OS and fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (n = 31, 9.9 months (95% CI; 8.1-11.7)) resulted in a shorter median OS than previously reported. Fluorouracil/oxaliplatin (n = 35, 5.8 months (95% CI; 4.5-7)) and best supportive care (n = 206, 1.8 months (95% CI; 1.5-2.1)) could not be benchmarked against any RCTs. The degree of protocol adherence explained differences between real-world outcomes and the respective RCTs, while exposure to second-line treatments did not.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia