Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces.
Schreuder, Janneke; Velkers, Francisca C; Bouwstra, Ruth J; Beerens, Nancy; Stegeman, J Arjan; de Boer, Willem F; Elbers, Armin R W; van Hooft, Pim; Feberwee, Anneke; Bossers, Alex; Jurburg, Stephanie D.
Afiliación
  • Schreuder J; Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CL, the Netherlands.
  • Velkers FC; Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CL, the Netherlands.
  • Bouwstra RJ; GD Animal Health, 7418EZ Deventer, the Netherlands.
  • Beerens N; Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, 8221RA Lelystad, the Netherlands.
  • Stegeman JA; Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CL, the Netherlands.
  • de Boer WF; Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Elbers ARW; Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, 8221RA Lelystad, the Netherlands.
  • van Hooft P; Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6708PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Feberwee A; GD Animal Health, 7418EZ Deventer, the Netherlands.
  • Bossers A; Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, 8221RA Lelystad, the Netherlands.
  • Jurburg SD; Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, 8221RA Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Poult Sci ; 98(12): 6542-6551, 2019 Dec 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31541252
ABSTRACT
Interspecies transmission of fecal microbiota can serve as an indicator for (indirect) contact between domestic and wild animals to assess risks of pathogen transmission, e.g., avian influenza. Here, we investigated whether oral inoculation of laying hens with feces of wild ducks (mallards, Anas platyrhynchos) resulted in a hen fecal microbiome that was detectably altered on community parameters or relative abundances of individual genera. To distinguish between effects of the duck inoculum and effects of the inoculation procedure, we compared the fecal microbiomes of adult laying hens resulting from 3 treatments inoculation with wild duck feces (duck), inoculation with chicken feces (auto), and a negative control group with no treatment. We collected cloacal swabs from 7 hens per treatment before (day 0), and 2 and 7 D after inoculation, and performed 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. No distinguishable effect of inoculation with duck feces on microbiome community (alpha and beta diversity) was found compared to auto or control treatments. At the individual taxonomic level, the relative abundance of the genus Alistipes (phylum Bacteroidetes) was significantly higher in the inoculated treatments (auto and duck) compared to the control 2 D after inoculation. Seven days after inoculation, the relative abundance of Alistipes had increased in the control and no effect was found anymore across treatments. These effects might be explained by the perturbation of the hen's microbiome caused by the inoculation procedure itself, or by intrinsic temporal variation in the hen's microbiome. This experiment shows that a single inoculation of fecal microbiota from duck feces to laying hens did not cause a measurable alteration of the gut microbiome community. Furthermore, the temporary change in relative abundance for Alistipes could not be attributed to the duck feces inoculation. These outcomes suggest that the fecal microbiome of adult laying hens may not be a useful indicator for detection of single oral exposure to wild duck feces.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pollos / Vacunación / Patos / Heces / Microbiota Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Poult Sci Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pollos / Vacunación / Patos / Heces / Microbiota Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Poult Sci Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos