Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Os calcaneus secundarius, a relevant differential diagnosis to fracture or pseudarthrosis of processus anterior of the calcaneus: a CT morphologic description.
Hennings, Robert; Voigt, Peter; Kahn, Thomas; Josten, Christoph; Ahrberg, Annette B.
Afiliación
  • Hennings R; Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, Leipzig, 04103, Germany. robert.hennings@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
  • Voigt P; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
  • Kahn T; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
  • Josten C; Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
  • Ahrberg AB; Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 41(12): 1425-1432, 2019 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563970
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

A fracture or a pseudarthrosis of the processus anterior calcanei (PAC) as well as a traumatized Os calcaneus secundarius (OCS) is often overlooked. A clinical or conventional radiological differentiation of these is uncertain. Therefore, a CT scan is recommended. The aim of the study was to identify CT morphological differentiators between OCS and pathologies of PAC.

METHODS:

All CT scans at our trauma center level I from 2010 to 2014, which imaged the entire foot, performed after acute trauma or postoperative control were retrospectively re-examined for OCS, other accessory ossicles (oAOS), fracture or pseudarthrosis of PAC and analyzed for specifiers.

RESULTS:

In 611 CT examinations, 14 (2.3%) accessory ossicles (AOS) at the PAC were detected. 12 (86%) were identified as typical OCS and 2 (14%) as oAOS. 56 (9.2%) pathologies were detected. Of these, 44 (79%) were declared as fractures and 12 (21%) as pseudarthrosis. 7 OCS (58%) and 25 (46%) of the pathologies were not mentioned in the initial CT reports. The main differentiators of OCS to fracture of PAC were the anteromedial localization into a concave notch at the calcaneal facet at PAC and the continuous corticalization. With increasing size, radiological osteoarthritic signs at the OCS were frequent (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The study confirms that AOS or pathologies at the PAC often are not exactly described in CT report. In the context of foot trauma, attention should be paid to this region. Based on the presented differentiation criteria, a precise distinction can be made with the help of a CT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Seudoartrosis / Calcáneo / Fracturas Óseas / Variación Anatómica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Radiol Anat Asunto de la revista: ANATOMIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Seudoartrosis / Calcáneo / Fracturas Óseas / Variación Anatómica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Radiol Anat Asunto de la revista: ANATOMIA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania