Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Designation of neonatal levels of care: a review of state regulatory and monitoring policies.
Kroelinger, Charlan D; Okoroh, Ekwutosi M; Goodman, David A; Lasswell, Sarah M; Barfield, Wanda D.
Afiliación
  • Kroelinger CD; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. ckroelinger@cdc.gov.
  • Okoroh EM; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Goodman DA; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Lasswell SM; Independent Consultant, Mosiac Consulting Group, LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Barfield WD; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Perinatol ; 40(3): 369-376, 2020 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31570793
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Summarize policies on levels of neonatal care designation among 50 states and District of Columbia (DC). STUDY

DESIGN:

Systematic review of publicly available, web-based information on levels of neonatal care designation policies for each state/DC. Information on designating authorities, designation oversight, licensure requirement, and ongoing monitoring for designated levels of care abstracted from 2019 published rules, statutes, and regulations.

RESULT:

Thirty-one (61%) of 50 states/DC had designated authority policies for neonatal levels of care. Fourteen (27%) incorporated oversight of neonatal levels of care into the licensure process. Among jurisdictions with designated authority, 25 (81%) used a state agency and 15 (48%) had direct oversight. Twenty-two (71%) of 31 states with a designating authority required ongoing monitoring, 14 (64%) used both hospital reporting and site visits for monitoring with only ten requiring site visits.

CONCLUSIONS:

Limited direct oversight influences regulation of regionalized systems, potentially impacting facility service monitoring and consequent management of vulnerable infants.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Gobierno Estatal / Recién Nacido / Regulación Gubernamental / Política de Salud / Neonatología Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Perinatol Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Gobierno Estatal / Recién Nacido / Regulación Gubernamental / Política de Salud / Neonatología Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Perinatol Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA