Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Snack Formulated with Ingredients to Slow Carbohydrate Digestion and Absorption Reduces the Glycemic Response in Humans: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rebello, Candida J; Johnson, William D; Pan, Yang; Larrivee, Sandra; Zhang, Dachuan; Nisbet, Mark; Johnson, Jodee; Chu, YiFang; Greenway, Frank L.
Afiliación
  • Rebello CJ; Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Johnson WD; Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Pan Y; PepsiCo R&D, Barrington, Illinois, USA.
  • Larrivee S; Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Zhang D; Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
  • Nisbet M; PepsiCo R&D, Barrington, Illinois, USA.
  • Johnson J; PepsiCo R&D, Barrington, Illinois, USA.
  • Chu Y; PepsiCo R&D, Barrington, Illinois, USA.
  • Greenway FL; Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
J Med Food ; 23(1): 21-28, 2020 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31596655
ABSTRACT
This study compared the effect of a snack with ingredients to slow carbohydrate digestion (Test-snack) on postprandial blood glucose and insulin concentrations and subjective appetite ratings. We hypothesized that Test-snack would lower glucose and insulin responses and reduce appetite compared with a Control-snack. Overweight or obese subjects (n = 17) completed a randomized crossover study. Glucose, insulin, and appetite ratings were measured before consuming each snack or white bread (Bread) and over a period of 4 h. Subjects received Test-snack, Control-snack, or Bread in random order at least a week apart. The a priori primary outcome was the glucose response, and the secondary outcomes were appetite ratings and insulin responses. Mixed effects statistical models were used to perform analysis of variance in terms of the area under curve (AUC) and at specific time points. The 2-h AUC for glucose was significantly lower with Test-snack compared to Control-snack and Bread (AUC and 95% confidence intervals Test = 2186.43 [1783.36-2589.51]; Control = 3293.75 [2893.97-3693.54]; Bread = 2800.28 [2405.79-3194.77] mg/dL · min). Four-hour AUC for glucose, and insulin, followed a similar pattern except that Test-snack did not differ from Bread. The glucose concentrations peaked at 45 min under all three conditions, but Test-snack elicited a lower response than Control-snack and Bread (P < .01). Test increased fullness and satisfaction and reduced hunger and prospective intake compared to Bread (P < .02), but was not significantly different from Control-snack. Ingredients that slow carbohydrate digestion in a snack reduce the postprandial glucose and insulin responses compared to a product without these ingredients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glucemia / Carbohidratos de la Dieta / Bocadillos / Insulina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Med Food Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glucemia / Carbohidratos de la Dieta / Bocadillos / Insulina Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Med Food Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...