Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of a combined lifestyle intervention with a financial incentive for chronically ill patients.
Molema, C C M; Wendel-Vos, G C W; Ter Schegget, S; Schuit, A J; van de Goor, L A M.
Afiliación
  • Molema CCM; Department of Tranzo, Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. claudia.molema@rivm.nl.
  • Wendel-Vos GCW; Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. claudia.molema@rivm.nl.
  • Ter Schegget S; Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Schuit AJ; Department of Health Science, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van de Goor LAM; Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
BMC Fam Pract ; 20(1): 137, 2019 10 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31627716
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aims to describe barriers and facilitators of the implementation of a combined lifestyle intervention (CLI) in primary care for patients with chronic disease. The aim of CLI to help patients to create a healthy lifestyle and to maintain this healthy lifestyle. During a CLI a patient receives advice and counselling to improve health-related behavior such as physical activity and diet. Special attention was given to the influence of adding a health promoting financial incentive (HPFI) for the participants to the CLI.

METHODS:

Twenty-four semi-structured interviews within six care groups were performed between July and October 2017. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded by two researchers independently.

RESULTS:

Respondents mentioned several preferred characteristics of the CLI such as easy accessibility of the intervention site and the presence of health care professionals during exercise sessions. Moreover, factors that could influence implementation (such as attitude of the health care professionals) and preconditions for a successful implementation of a CLI (such as structural funding and good infrastructure) were identified. Overall, positive HPFIs (e.g. a reward) were preferred over negative HPFIs (e.g. a fine). According to the respondents, HPFIs could positively influence the degree of participation, and break down barriers for participating in and finishing the CLI.

CONCLUSIONS:

Multiple barriers and facilitators for successful implementation of a CLI were identified. For successful implementing CLIs, a positive attitude of all stakeholders is essential and specific preconditions should be fulfilled. With regard to adding a HPFI, more research is needed to identify the attitude of specific target groups towards an HPFI.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Crónica / Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Fam Pract Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad Crónica / Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Fam Pract Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...