Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support.
Van Baarle, Eva M; Potma, Marieke C; van Hoek, Maria E C; Hartman, Laura A; Molewijk, Bert A C; van Gurp, Jelle L P.
Afiliación
  • Van Baarle EM; Netherlands Defense Academy, Breda, the Netherlands. em.v.baarle@mindef.nl.
  • Potma MC; Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands. em.v.baarle@mindef.nl.
  • van Hoek MEC; Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Hartman LA; Department of Care Ethics, University of Humanistic Studies (UvH), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Molewijk BAC; Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Gurp JLP; Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre (VUmc), EMGO+, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
BMC Med Ethics ; 20(1): 78, 2019 11 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31675970
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Various forms of Clinical Ethics Support (CES) have been developed in health care organizations. Over the past years, increasing attention has been paid to the question of how to foster the quality of ethics support. In the Netherlands, a CES quality assessment project based on a responsive evaluation design has been implemented. CES practitioners themselves reflected upon the quality of ethics support within each other's health care organizations. This study presents a qualitative evaluation of this Responsive Quality Assessment (RQA) project.

METHODS:

CES practitioners' experiences with and perspectives on the RQA project were collected by means of ten semi-structured interviews. Both the data collection and the qualitative data analysis followed a stepwise approach, including continuous peer review and careful documentation of the decisions.

RESULTS:

The main findings illustrate the relevance of the RQA with regard to fostering the quality of CES by connecting to context specific issues, such as gaining support from upper management and to solidify CES services within health care organizations. Based on their participation in the RQA, CES practitioners perceived a number of changes regarding CES in Dutch health care organizations after the RQA acknowledgement of the relevance of CES for the quality of care; CES practices being more formalized; inspiration for developing new CES-related activities and more self-reflection on existing CES practices.

CONCLUSIONS:

The evaluation of the RQA shows that this method facilitates an open learning process by actively involving CES practitioners and their concrete practices. Lessons learned include that "servant leadership" and more intensive guidance of RQA participants may help to further enhance both the critical dimension and the learning process within RQA.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Comités de Ética Clínica / Atención a la Salud Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Ethics Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Ethics Asunto de la revista: ETICA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Comités de Ética Clínica / Atención a la Salud Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Ethics Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Ethics Asunto de la revista: ETICA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos