Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy.
Marascio, Joseph; Spratt, Daniel E; Zhang, Jingbin; Trabulsi, Edouard J; Le, Tiffany; Sedzorme, Worlanyo Sosu; Beeler, Whitney H; Davicioni, Elai; Dabbas, Bashar; Lin, Daniel W; Gore, John L; Bloom, Matthew; Mann, Mark; Mark, J Ryan; Calvaresi, Anne; Godwin, James L; McCue, Peter; Hurwitz, Mark D; Kelly, W Kevin; Lallas, Costas D; Knudsen, Karen E; Gomella, Leonard G; Dicker, Adam P; Den, Robert B.
Afiliación
  • Marascio J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Spratt DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Zhang J; Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Trabulsi EJ; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Le T; Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Sedzorme WS; Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Beeler WH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Davicioni E; Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Dabbas B; Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Lin DW; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Gore JL; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Bloom M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Mann M; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Mark JR; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Calvaresi A; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Godwin JL; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • McCue P; Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Hurwitz MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Kelly WK; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lallas CD; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Knudsen KE; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Gomella LG; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Dicker AP; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Den RB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. robert.den@jefferson.edu.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 23(2): 295-302, 2020 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31719663
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Genomic classifiers (GC) have been shown to improve risk stratification post prostatectomy. However, their clinical benefit has not been prospectively demonstrated. We sought to determine the impact of GC testing on postoperative management in men with prostate cancer post prostatectomy.

METHODS:

Two prospective registries of prostate cancer patients treated between 2014 and 2019 were included. All men underwent Decipher tumor testing for adverse features post prostatectomy (Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA). The clinical utility cohort, which measured the change in treatment decision-making, captured pre- and postgenomic treatment recommendations from urologists across diverse practice settings (n = 3455). The clinical benefit cohort, which examined the difference in outcome, was from a single academic institution whose tumor board predefined "best practices" based on GC results (n = 135).

RESULTS:

In the clinical utility cohort, providers' recommendations pregenomic testing were primarily observation (69%). GC testing changed recommendations for 39% of patients, translating to a number needed to test of 3 to change one treatment decision. In the clinical benefit cohort, 61% of patients had genomic high-risk tumors; those who received the recommended adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) had 2-year PSA recurrence of 3 vs. 25% for those who did not (HR 0.1 [95% CI 0.0-0.6], p = 0.013). For the genomic low/intermediate-risk patients, 93% followed recommendations for observation, with similar 2-year PSA recurrence rates compared with those who received ART (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of GC substantially altered treatment decision-making, with a number needed to test of only 3. Implementing best practices to routinely recommend ART for genomic-high patients led to larger than expected improvements in early biochemical endpoints, without jeopardizing outcomes for genomic-low/intermediate-risk patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostatectomía / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Biomarcadores de Tumor / Medición de Riesgo / Selección de Paciente / Toma de Decisiones Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostatectomía / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Biomarcadores de Tumor / Medición de Riesgo / Selección de Paciente / Toma de Decisiones Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos