Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Previous Abdominal Surgery on Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery.
Du, Yibao; Chen, Guoqing; Zhang, Pin; Gu, Yifan.
Afiliación
  • Du Y; Department of General Surgery, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Chen G; Department of General Surgery, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Zhang P; Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: chinayzonnezp@126.com.
  • Gu Y; Department of General Surgery, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: guyif2017@hotmail.com.
J Surg Res ; 247: 197-201, 2020 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740012
BACKGROUND: Previous abdominal surgery (PAS) is a relative contraindication of laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of PAS on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB) in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for a total of 235 consecutive patients with obesity and T2DM from Shanghai Tongren Hospital from February 2011 to December 2015. The patients were classified into two groups: no previous abdominal surgery group (NPAS group, n = 179) and previous abdominal surgery group (PAS group, n = 56). The patients underwent LRYGB, and the data of basic information, presence of adhesions, adhesiolysis requirement, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and perioperative and postoperative complications were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Adhesion was found in 14 patients in the NPAS group and in 43 patients in the PAS group, with adhesiolysis requirement in 4 (2.23%) and 37 (66.07%) patients, respectively (P < 0.05). There were no complications directly associated with adhesiolysis. No patients were converted to open surgery. There were no significant differences in gender (P = 0.30), T2DM duration (P = 0.58), body mass index (P = 0.06), blood loss (P = 0.36), or perioperative or postoperative complications (P = 0.41) between the groups. Significant differences were observed in the mean age, ASA score, operative time, and hospital stay between the groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PAS is relatively safe and feasible for LRYGB in Chinese patients with obesity and T2DM.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Laparoscopía / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Laparoscopía / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos