Patient values regarding overlapping surgery: Identification of distinct patient subgroups.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To explore patient values associated with their comfort level with surgical trainees and attending surgeon absence from the operating room. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with general medical patients. METHODS: We analyzed data from qualitative interviews with patients that included a quantitative rating on a visual analog scale (VAS) of comfort consenting to three surgical scenarios, including overlapping surgery, to identify subgroups of patients based on comfort level. After identifying subgroups, we compared qualitative responses from participants who were generally comfortable with overlapping surgery to those who were uncomfortable to identify themes associated with these perceptions. RESULTS: We identified three subgroups of patients based on the patterns of VAS responses. Participants who were comfortable with overlapping surgery expressed trust in the surgeon and delegation process. Those who were most uncomfortable expressed a strong desire to know who was operating on them, and a desire for control over their surgical process. Subjects uncomfortable with overlapping surgery were also generally not sensitive to tradeoffs (cost, timing). CONCLUSIONS: We identified distinct subgroups of patients based on their comfort level with trainee independence and primary attending availability. By examining the predominant values in these subgroups, we identified potential explanations for patient discomfort with attending absence. Strategies to enhance patients' knowledge about the process of surgery and a sense of control over their own care may improve comfort with trainee participation and overlapping surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 6 Laryngoscope, 2019.