Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes in children evaluated but not transported by ambulance personnel: retrospective cohort study.
Oulasvirta, Jelena; Salmi, Heli; Kuisma, Markku; Rahiala, Eero; Lääperi, Mitja; Harve-Rytsälä, Heini.
Afiliación
  • Oulasvirta J; Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Salmi H; FinnHEMS Research and Development Unit, FinnHEMS, Vantaa, Finland.
  • Kuisma M; Department of Emergency Care and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Rahiala E; Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Lääperi M; New Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Harve-Rytsälä H; Department of Emergency Care and Services, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 3(1): e000523, 2019.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31750406
BACKGROUND: Not all children with an out-of-hospital emergency medical contact are transported by ambulance to the emergency department (ED). Non-transport means that after on-scene evaluation and possible treatment, ambulance personnel may advise the patient to monitor the situation at home or may refer the patient to seek medical attention by other means of transport. As selecting the right patients for ambulance transport is critical for optimising patient safety and resource use, we studied outcomes in non-transported children to identify possible risk groups that could benefit from ambulance transport. METHODS: In a population-based retrospective cohort study of all children aged 0-15 years encountered but not transported by ambulance in Helsinki, Finland, between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016, we evaluated (1) 12-month mortality, (2) intensive care admissions, (3) unscheduled ED contacts within the following 96 hours after the non-transport decision and (4) the clinical status of the child on presentation to ED in the case of a secondary ED visit. RESULTS: Of all children encountered by out-of-hospital emergency medical services, 3579/7765 (46%) were not transported to ED by ambulance. There was no mortality or intensive care admissions related to the non-transport. The risk factors for an unscheduled secondary ED visit after a non-transport decision were young age (p=0.001), non-transport decision during the early morning hours (p<0.001) and certain dispatch codes, including 'dyspnoea' (p<0.001), 'vomiting/diarrhoea' (p=0.030) and 'mental illness' (p=0.019). We did not detect deterioration in patients' clinical presentation at ED traceable to non-transport decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Not transporting all children by ambulance after an out-of-hospital emergency medical contact was not associated with deaths, intensive care admissions or significant deterioration in general condition in our study population and healthcare system. Special attention and a formal non-transport protocol are warranted in certain subgroups, including infants.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Paediatr Open Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Paediatr Open Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido