Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bring More Data!-A Good Advice? Removing Separation in Logistic Regression by Increasing Sample Size.
Sinkovec, Hana; Geroldinger, Angelika; Heinze, Georg.
Afiliación
  • Sinkovec H; Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems (CEMSIIS), Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Geroldinger A; Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems (CEMSIIS), Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Heinze G; Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems (CEMSIIS), Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31766753
ABSTRACT
The parameters of logistic regression models are usually obtained by the method of maximum likelihood (ML). However, in analyses of small data sets or data sets with unbalanced outcomes or exposures, ML parameter estimates may not exist. This situation has been termed 'separation' as the two outcome groups are separated by the values of a covariate or a linear combination of covariates. To overcome the problem of non-existing ML parameter estimates, applying Firth's correction (FC) was proposed. In practice, however, a principal investigator might be advised to 'bring more data' in order to solve a separation issue. We illustrate the problem by means of examples from colorectal cancer screening and ornithology. It is unclear if such an increasing sample size (ISS) strategy that keeps sampling new observations until separation is removed improves estimation compared to applying FC to the original data set. We performed an extensive simulation study where the main focus was to estimate the cost-adjusted relative efficiency of ML combined with ISS compared to FC. FC yielded reasonably small root mean squared errors and proved to be the more efficient estimator. Given our findings, we propose not to adapt the sample size when separation is encountered but to use FC as the default method of analysis whenever the number of observations or outcome events is critically low.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Tamaño de la Muestra / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Tamaño de la Muestra / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria