Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chronic kidney disease is a main confounding factor for 25-vitamin D measurement.
Machado, Hanna Karla Andrade Guapyassú; Martins, Carolina Steller Wagner; Jorgetti, Vanda; Elias, Rosilene Motta; Moysés, Rosa Maria Affonso.
Afiliación
  • Machado HKAG; Divisão de Nefrologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Martins CSW; Divisão de Nefrologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Jorgetti V; Divisão de Nefrologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Elias RM; Divisão de Nefrologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Moysés RMA; Divisão de Nefrologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
J Bras Nefrol ; 42(1): 94-98, 2020 Mar.
Article en Pt, En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31769778
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Current guidelines recommend assessment of 25-vitamin D status in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although significant differences among assays have been described, the impact of CKD on this variability has never been tested.

METHODS:

We tested the variability between two 25-vitamin D assays in patients with CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2) who had consecutive 25-vitamin D measurements in 2015 (Assay 1 - Diasorin LIASON 25 TOTAL - D assay®) and 2016 (Assay 2 - Beckman Coulter Unicel Xl 800®). The cohort consisted of 791 adult patients (122 with normal renal function and 669 with CKD - 33, 30, and 37% in stages 3, 4, and 5 on dialysis, respectively).

RESULTS:

Levels of 25-vitamin D were lower and the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D using assay 1 was higher than using assay 2 in patients with CKD, regardless of similar levels of calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone. As kidney function decreased, the percentage of disagreement between the assays increased.

CONCLUSION:

There is a noteworthy variability between assays in patients with CKD such that the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D is modified. The mechanism behind this result is still unclear and might be due to a possible interference in the analytical process. However, the clinical significance is unquestionable, as the supplementation of vitamin D can be erroneously prescribed to these patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vitamina D / Deficiencia de Vitamina D / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En / Pt Revista: J Bras Nefrol Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vitamina D / Deficiencia de Vitamina D / Fallo Renal Crónico Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En / Pt Revista: J Bras Nefrol Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil
...