Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Causal Analysis of the Effects of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Versus No Long-Acting Bronchodilator Use on Readmission or Mortality After Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Roberts, Melissa H; Mapel, Douglas W; Petersen, Hans.
Afiliación
  • Roberts MH; College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, MSC09 5360, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, USA. MHRoberts@salud.unm.edu.
  • Mapel DW; College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, MSC09 5360, Albuquerque, NM, 87131-0001, USA.
  • Petersen H; Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Drugs Real World Outcomes ; 7(1): 1-17, 2020 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31792873
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Retrospective observational studies may provide real-world evidence about long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA) effectiveness in reducing mortality or COPD-related readmission risk after a COPD hospitalization. Causal inference and competing risk statistical procedures aid in managing confounding and competing outcome events that complicate retrospective analyses.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare COPD-related readmission and mortality risk among patients receiving a LAMA versus patients receiving no long-acting bronchodilator ("no LABD") within 30 days post-discharge.

METHODS:

This retrospective observational analysis of patients (aged ≥ 40 years) hospitalized for COPD used claims data (years 2004-2012). Events occurring during the period from 31 days through 12 months post-discharge were compared. The hazard ratio (HR) for the combined outcome of COPD-related readmission or mortality was estimated using Cox regression. Confounding was addressed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The competing risk of non-COPD-related readmission was considered.

RESULTS:

10,405 COPD patients were included (LAMA = 751, no LABD = 9654). IPTW achieved a balanced sample (10,518 LAMA, 10,405 no LABD). Unweighted HR (LAMA vs no LABD) for COPD-related readmission or death, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and baseline utilization, was 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84, 1.20]. Weighted (IPTW) adjusted HR was 0.94 (95% CI 0.88, 1.00). Unweighted and weighted HRs further adjusted for competing risk were 0.97 (95% CI 0.82, 1.16) and 0.91 (0.86, 0.98), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Bias by indication and comorbidities make the measurement of retrospective COPD treatment effectiveness difficult. Using IPTW and additionally considering the competing event risk, LAMA use was associated with a small reduction in risk for COPD-related readmission or death over the period from 31 days to 12 months post-discharge.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Drugs Real World Outcomes Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Drugs Real World Outcomes Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos