Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MRI-assisted radiosurgery: A quality assurance nomogram for palladium-103 and iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy.
Hanania, Alexander N; Kudchadker, Rajat J; Bruno, Teresa L; Tang, Chad; Anscher, Mitchell S; Frank, Steven J.
Afiliación
  • Hanania AN; Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Kudchadker RJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Bruno TL; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Tang C; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Anscher MS; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  • Frank SJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: sjfrank@mdanderson.org.
Brachytherapy ; 19(1): 38-42, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31812590
PURPOSE: We sought to develop an activity nomogram for magnetic resonance (MR)-planned permanent seed prostate brachytherapy to improve quality assurance through a secondary dosimetric check. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients undergoing MRI-assisted radiosurgery (MARS), whereby MRI is used for preoperative planning and postimplant dosimetry, were reviewed from May 2016 to September 2018. Planned activity (U) was fitted by MR-prostate volume (cc) via simple linear regression. Resulting monotherapy nomograms were compared with institutional nomograms from an ultrasound-planned cohort. Dosimetric coverage and external urinary sphincter (EUS) dose were also assessed for MR-planned patients. RESULTS: We identified 183 patients treated with MARS: 146 patients received palladium-103 (103Pd; 102 monotherapy and 44 boost), and 37 received iodine-125 (125I) monotherapy. Median prostate volume was 28 cc (interquartile range: 22-35). Lines of best fit for implant activity were U = 4.344 × (vol) + 54.13 (R2: 95%) for 103Pd monotherapy, U = 3.202 (vol) + 39.72 (R2: 96%) for 103Pd boost and U = 0.684 (vol) + 13.38 (R2: 96%) for 125I monotherapy. Compared with ultrasound, MR-planned nomograms had lower activity per volume (p < 0.05) for both 103Pd monotherapy (∼6%) and 125I monotherapy (∼11%), given a median size (30 cc) prostate. Across all MARS implants, postimplant dosimetry revealed a median V100% of 94% (interquartile range: 92-96%). Median EUS V125 was <1 cc for all patients, regardless of isotope. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a quality assurance nomogram for MR-planned prostate brachytherapy. When compared with ultrasound-planned, MR-planned monotherapy resulted in a lower activity-to-volume ratio while maintaining dosimetric coverage, likely secondary to EUS-sparing and reduced planning target margins.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud / Braquiterapia / Nomogramas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Asunto de la revista: RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud / Braquiterapia / Nomogramas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Asunto de la revista: RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos