Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.
Savolainen, Roosa; Koskinen, Juha M; Mentula, Silja; Koskinen, Janne O; Kaukoranta, Suvi-Sirkku.
Afiliación
  • Savolainen R; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland roosa.savolainen@vshp.fi juha.koskinen@arcdia.com.
  • Koskinen JM; ArcDia International Ltd., Turku, Finland roosa.savolainen@vshp.fi juha.koskinen@arcdia.com.
  • Mentula S; Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Koskinen JO; Expert Microbiology Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Kaukoranta SS; ArcDia International Ltd., Turku, Finland.
J Clin Microbiol ; 58(4)2020 03 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31941691
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel automated random-access test, mariPOC CDI (ArcDia Ltd., Finland), for the detection of Clostridioides difficile glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxins A and B directly from fecal specimens. The mariPOC test was compared with both the GenomEra C. difficile PCR assay (Abacus Diagnostica Oy, Finland) and the TechLab C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Alere Inc.; now Abbot) membrane enzyme immunoassay (MEIA). Culture and the Xpert C. difficile assay (Cepheid Inc., USA) were used to resolve discrepant results. In total, 337 specimens were tested with the mariPOC CDI test and GenomEra PCR. Of these specimens, 157 were also tested with the TechLab MEIA. The sensitivity of the mariPOC test for GDH was slightly lower (95.2%) than that obtained with the TechLab assay (100.0%), but no toxin-positive cases were missed. The sensitivity of the mariPOC test for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile by analyzing toxin expression was better (81.6%) than that of the TechLab assay (71.1%). The analytical specificities for the mariPOC and the TechLab tests were 98.3% and 100.0% for GDH and 100.0% and 99.2% for toxin A/B, respectively. The analytical specificity of the GenomEra method was 100.0%. The mariPOC and TechLab GDH tests and GenomEra PCR had high negative predictive values of 99.3%, 98.3%, and 99.7%, respectively, in excluding infection with toxigenic C. difficile The mariPOC toxin A/B test and GenomEra PCR had an identical analytical positive predictive value of 100%, providing highly reliable information about toxin expression and the presence of toxin genes, respectively.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toxinas Bacterianas / Clostridioides difficile / Infecciones por Clostridium Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toxinas Bacterianas / Clostridioides difficile / Infecciones por Clostridium Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article