Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An in vitro investigation comparing methods of minimizing excess luting agent for cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Bukhari, Sarah A; AlHelal, Abdulaziz; Kattadiyil, Mathew T; Wadhwani, Chandur P K; Taleb, Abdulrahman; Dehom, Salem.
Afiliación
  • Bukhari SA; Assistant Professor, Division of General Dentistry, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, Calif. Electronic address: sbukari@llu.edu.
  • AlHelal A; Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  • Kattadiyil MT; Professor and Director, Advanced Specialty Education Program in Prosthodontics, Loma Linda University School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, Calif.
  • Wadhwani CPK; Adjunct Assistant Professor, Advanced Specialty Education Program in Prosthodontics School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, Calif.
  • Taleb A; Graduate student, Advanced Specialty Education Program in Prosthodontics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
  • Dehom S; Assistant Professor, Loma Linda University School of Nursing, Loma Linda, Calif.
J Prosthet Dent ; 124(6): 706-715, 2020 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31987589
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The use of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses is a well-established treatment option. Techniques have been proposed to reduce the amount of residual excess cement (REC) around cement-retained single-implant restorations. However, studies evaluating the effectiveness of such techniques related to cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures (CRISFPDs) are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effectiveness of various cement application techniques for CRISFPDs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two implant analogs were placed in the lateral incisor sites in a maxillary, 3D printed cast with 4 missing incisors. Twenty standardized, removable, printed soft-tissue replicas, 40 milled titanium custom abutments, and 20 milled zirconia CRISFPDs were fabricated. Two cement application techniques, the brush on technique (BOT), and the polyvinyl siloxane index (PI) technique were compared. Two cementation techniques, without bib (control) (n=10) and with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bib (test) (n=10), were used. A premeasured amount of interim cement was used to cement the CRISFPDs. The CRISFPDs were retrieved after cementation, and standardized photographs of 4 quadrants of each abutment-CRISFPD assembly were made by using a software program that is used to calculate the ratio between the area covered with REC and the total specimen area. The extension of the REC on both the abutment and soft-tissue replica was measured at sites before and after cleaning the REC. A generalized linear mixed-model procedure was used for statistical analysis (α=.05). RESULTS: For cement application, the polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) index technique had significantly less REC than the brush on technique (P<.05). The use of a PTFE bib led to significantly less REC than when no bib was used (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the PVS index technique along with a PTFE bib was effective in reducing REC for CRISFPDs.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Cementos Dentales Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Cementos Dentales Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos