Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A negative-feedback loop maintains optimal chemokine concentrations for directional cell migration.
Lau, Stephanie; Feitzinger, Anna; Venkiteswaran, Gayatri; Wang, John; Lewellis, Stephen W; Koplinski, Chad A; Peterson, Francis C; Volkman, Brian F; Meier-Schellersheim, Martin; Knaut, Holger.
Afiliación
  • Lau S; Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Feitzinger A; Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Venkiteswaran G; Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Wang J; Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Lewellis SW; Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Koplinski CA; Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Peterson FC; Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Volkman BF; Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Meier-Schellersheim M; Laboratory of Systems Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. mms@niaid.nih.gov.
  • Knaut H; Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. holger.knaut@med.nyu.edu.
Nat Cell Biol ; 22(3): 266-273, 2020 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32042179
Chemoattractant gradients frequently guide migrating cells. To achieve the most directional signal, such gradients should be maintained with concentrations around the dissociation constant (Kd)1-6 of the chemoreceptor. Whether this actually occurs in animals is unknown. Here we investigate whether a moving tissue, the zebrafish posterior lateral line primordium, buffers its attractant in this concentration range to achieve robust migration. We find that the Cxcl12 (also known as Sdf1) attractant gradient ranges from 0 to 12 nM, values similar to the 3.4 nM Kd of its receptor Cxcr4. When we increase the Kd of Cxcl12 for Cxcr4, primordium migration is less directional. Furthermore, a negative-feedback loop between Cxcl12 and its clearance receptor Ackr3 (also known as Cxcr7) regulates the Cxcl12 concentrations. Breaking this negative feedback by blocking the phosphorylation of the cytoplasmic tail of Ackr3 also results in less directional primordium migration. Thus, directed migration of the primordium is dependent on a close match between the Cxcl12 concentration and the Kd of Cxcl12 for Cxcr4, which is maintained by buffering of the chemokine levels. Quantitative modelling confirms the plausibility of this mechanism. We anticipate that buffering of attractant concentration is a general mechanism for ensuring robust cell migration.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Movimiento Celular / Quimiocinas Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nat Cell Biol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Movimiento Celular / Quimiocinas Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nat Cell Biol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido