Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The glenohumeral micromotion and influence of the glenohumeral ligaments during axial rotation in varying abduction angle.
Sahara, Wataru; Yamazaki, Takaharu; Inui, Tetsuya; Konda, Shoji; Sugamoto, Kazuomi.
Afiliación
  • Sahara W; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. Electronic address: w-sahara@umin.ac.jp.
  • Yamazaki T; Department of Information Systems, Saitama Institute of Technology, Fukaya City, Saitama, Japan.
  • Inui T; Department of Orthopaedic Biomaterial Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita City, Osaka, Japan.
  • Konda S; Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita City, Osaka, Japan.
  • Sugamoto K; Department of Orthopaedic Biomaterial Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita City, Osaka, Japan.
J Orthop Sci ; 25(6): 980-985, 2020 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32044161
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The patients with shoulder instability or disorders in overhead athletes have been considered to have an abnormal micromotion at the glenohumeral joint. However, the normal range of the micromotion has not been available during axial rotation with various abduction angles, especially above 90° abduction. This study aimed to investigate the glenohumeral translation and influence of the glenohumeral ligaments during axial rotation with up to maximum abduction.

METHODS:

Fourteen healthy volunteers performed active axial rotations at 0°, 90°, 135°, and maximal abduction angles. The positions of the humeral head center relative to the glenoid at maximally external, neutral, and maximally internal rotations (ER, NR, IR, respectively) for each abduction angle were evaluated using two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) shape matching registration techniques. The shortest pathway and its length between the origin and insertion of the superior, middle, and inferior glenohumeral ligaments (SGHL, MGHL, and IGHL, respectively) were calculated for each position.

RESULTS:

The glenohumeral joint showed 3.1 mm of superoinferior translation during axial rotation at 0° abduction (P < 0.0001), and 2.6 mm and 4.5 mm anteroposterior translation at 135° and maximal abduction (P < 0.0001), respectively. The SGHL and MGHL reached a maximum length at ER with 0° abduction, and the anterior and posterior bands of the IGHL reached a maximum at ER with 90° abduction and IR with 0° abduction.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings indicated that the SGHL played a role as an inferior suppressor at 0° abduction, while the anterior band of IGHL played a role as an anterior stabilizer at 90° abduction. Every glenohumeral ligament did not get taut and the anteroposterior translation became greater with increasing abduction angle, above 90°. These results could be used as a reference when comparing with the pathological shoulders in the future study.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación del Hombro / Inestabilidad de la Articulación Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Sci Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación del Hombro / Inestabilidad de la Articulación Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Sci Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article