Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Oral Prostacyclins: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Dean, Bonnie B; Saundankar, Vishal; Stafkey-Mailey, Dana; Anguiano, Rebekah H; Nelsen, Andrew C; Gordon, Kathryn; Classi, Peter.
Afiliación
  • Dean BB; Xcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA. bonnie.dean@xcenda.com.
  • Saundankar V; Xcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
  • Stafkey-Mailey D; Xcenda, LLC, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
  • Anguiano RH; College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Nelsen AC; United Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Gordon K; United Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
  • Classi P; United Therapeutics Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Drugs Real World Outcomes ; 7(3): 229-239, 2020 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32144746
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Given the improved convenience of oral prostacyclins, there is a shift toward their use in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

OBJECTIVES:

Our objective was to compare patient characteristics, medication adherence, healthcare resource use (HCRU), and costs among patients receiving oral treprostinil or selexipag.

METHODS:

We used Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases to identify patients with PAH with a diagnosis code for pulmonary hypertension (PH) plus a prescription for oral treprostinil or selexipag from July 2013 to September 2017. Medication adherence, persistence, and all-cause and PAH-related HCRU and costs were compared between cohorts during the 6-month follow-up. Adjusted healthcare costs were obtained using recycled predictions and bootstrapped samples.

RESULTS:

A total of 256 (130 oral treprostinil, 126 selexipag) patients fulfilled the study criteria. The oral treprostinil cohort was more likely to be male, to have previously used parenteral prostacyclins, and to have higher outpatient costs at baseline than the selexipag cohort. During follow-up, both cohorts had similar proportions of patients who were adherent to and persistent with their respective therapies. All-cause and PAH-related medical utilization was generally similar between cohorts. The oral treprostinil cohort had 66.9% lower total PAH-related healthcare costs (mean difference - $75,183; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 102,584 to - 49,771) and 70.6% lower PAH-related pharmacy costs (mean difference - $76,439; 95% CI - 104,512 to - 51,458) than the selexipag cohort, with similar differences in all-cause healthcare and pharmacy costs.

CONCLUSIONS:

Lower all-cause and PAH-related total healthcare and pharmacy costs were observed in patients receiving oral treprostinil compared with those receiving selexipag. It will be important to study longer-term costs and clinical outcomes.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Idioma: En Revista: Drugs Real World Outcomes Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Idioma: En Revista: Drugs Real World Outcomes Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos