Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommendations statement on the immunosuppressive treatment of non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-anterior uveitis. / Documento de recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento con inmunodepresores de la uveítis no anterior, no infecciosa, no neoplásica.
Espinosa, Gerard; Herreras, José M; Muñoz-Fernández, Santiago; García Ruiz de Morales, José M; Cordero-Coma, Miguel.
Afiliación
  • Espinosa G; Servicio de Enfermedades Autoinmunes, Institut Clínic de Medicina i Dermatologia, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, España.
  • Herreras JM; IOBA (Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología), Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, España; Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España.
  • Muñoz-Fernández S; Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, España; Universidad Europea, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, España.
  • García Ruiz de Morales JM; Unidad de Uveítis, Servicio de Inmunología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, España; Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de León (IBIOMED), León, España.
  • Cordero-Coma M; Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de León (IBIOMED), León, España; Unidad de uveítis, Servicio de Oftalmología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, España. Electronic address: miguelcorderocoma@gmail.com.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 155(5): 220.e1-220.e12, 2020 09 11.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32199631
OBJECTIVE: To generate recommendations on the use of immunomodulators in patients with non-infectious, non-neoplastic intermediate uveitis (IU), posterior uveitis (PU) and panuveitis (PanU) based on best evidence and experience. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of 5 experts was established, who defined the scope, users, and sections of the document. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs in patients with non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-anterior uveitis. The results of the SLR were presented and discussed during an expert meeting in which 34 recommendations were generated. The level of agreement with the recommendations was also tested in 25 additional experts following a Delphi process. Recommendations were voted from 1 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). We defined agreement if at least 70% of the experts voted ≥7. The level of evidence and grade or recommendation were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. RESULTS: The SLR included 33 articles. The 34 recommendations were accepted after 2 Delphi rounds (3 of them were modified after the first round). They include specific recommendations on patients with non-infectious, non-neoplastic, PU and PanU, as well as different treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-infectious, non-neoplastic, non-anterior uveitis these recommendations might help treatment decision making, due to the lack of robust evidence or other globally accepted algorithms.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uveítis / Panuveítis / Uveítis Anterior Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Med Clin (Barc) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uveítis / Panuveítis / Uveítis Anterior Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Med Clin (Barc) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: España