[Comparison of minimal invasive technologies for treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis]. / Sravnitel'naia otsenka minimal'no invazivnykh metodik lecheniia infitsirovannogo pankreonekroza.

ABSTRACT

AIM: the assessment of the role of minimally invasive interventional procedures in the treatment of patients with infected pancreatic necrosis and their safety, as well as comparison of the results of the most common modern minimally invasive techniques among themselves. METHODS: The results of treatment of 310 patients are presented with infected destructive pancreatitis from 2013 to 2018 on the basis of the city clinical hospital named after I.V. Davydovsky. The patients were divided into three groups in the first one (n=170) patients underwent puncture followed by drainage of necrotic foci under ultrasound and CT control, in the second (n=98) patients underwent sanation of foci completely by laparoscopic access, in the third (n=42) a series of retroperitoneoscopy was used for the same purpose. RESULTS: In 114 (67.1%) cases, patients from the first group did not require further surgical intervention. The results of percutaneous drainage were successful. The average length of hospital stay in the first group was 27 days, in the second and third groups - 31 days (the ratio in the 2nd and 3rd groups was 1.03 (95% CI 0.97-1.08; p<0.05)). In the course of treatment, complications were identified in 35 (35.7%) patients in the 2nd and 17 (40.4%) patients in the 3rd group (ratio 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.94)). There were 22 (7.1%) deaths. The causes of death were 1 (0.3%) of the patient had arrosive bleeding, 2 (0.7%) had duodenal fistulas, 19 (6.1%) multiple organ failure against the background of widespread retroperitoneal phlegmon. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis depends on the possibility of full drainage of the necrotic focus, regardless of approach. Minimally invasive techniques can reduce intraoperative trauma by reducing the wound surface, which contribute to develop systemic inflammatory response syndrome.