Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determining the effectiveness of early intensive versus escalation approaches for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: The DELIVER-MS study protocol.
Ontaneda, Daniel; Tallantyre, Emma C; Raza, Praneeta C; Planchon, Sarah M; Nakamura, Kunio; Miller, Deborah; Hersh, Carrie; Craner, Mathew; Bale, Clare; Chaudhry, Burhan; Gunzler, Douglas D; Love, Thomas E; Gerry, Stephen; Coles, Alasdair; Cohen, Jeffrey A; Evangelou, Nikos.
Afiliación
  • Ontaneda D; Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States. Electronic address: ontaned@ccf.org.
  • Tallantyre EC; Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
  • Raza PC; Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Planchon SM; Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Nakamura K; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Miller D; Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Hersh C; Lou Ruvo Brain Center, Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, United States.
  • Craner M; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Bale C; University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Chaudhry B; Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
  • Gunzler DD; Center for Health Care Research & Policy, Case Western Reserve University at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Love TE; Center for Health Care Research & Policy, Case Western Reserve University at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Gerry S; Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Coles A; Neuroscience Department, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Cohen JA; Department of Neurology, Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
  • Evangelou N; Clinical Neurology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 95: 106009, 2020 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32320842
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a common cause of neurological disability among young adults and has a high economic burden. Currently there are 18 disease modifying agents for relapsing MS, which were tested in clinical trials versus placebo or an active comparator in a pairwise manner. However, there is currently no consensus on the fundamental principles of treatment approach and initial therapy selection. These factors result in variable use of disease modifying therapies. Here we describe the study protocol for Determining the Effectiveness of earLy Intensive Versus Escalation approaches for the Treatment of Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DELIVER-MS). The main objective of the study is to determine whether an early highly effective treatment approach, defined as use of one of four monoclonal antibodies as initial therapy, is more effective than an escalation treatment approach (any other approved medication as initial therapy with subsequent escalation to higher efficacy treatments guided by radiological and clinical evaluation). The primary endpoint of the study is reduction in normalized brain volume loss from baseline visit to month 36 visit using MRI. Brain volume loss was selected as the best short-term predictor of long-term clinical disability. A total of 400 participants will be randomized 1:1 using minimization to account for age and sex by site, and 400 will be enrolled into a parallel observational cohort. The study results will help guide overall treatment philosophy and will have important implications for patient choice, clinical practice, and treatment access.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente / Esclerosis Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contemp Clin Trials Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente / Esclerosis Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Contemp Clin Trials Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos