Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do dissatisfied patients have unrealistic expectations? A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis in knee and hip arthroplasty patients.
Hafkamp, Frederique J; Gosens, Taco; de Vries, Jolanda; den Oudsten, Brenda L.
Afiliación
  • Hafkamp FJ; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
  • Gosens T; Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
  • de Vries J; Department of Orthopedics, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands.
  • den Oudsten BL; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
EFORT Open Rev ; 5(4): 226-240, 2020 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32377391
End-stage osteoarthritis is commonly treated with joint replacement. Despite high clinical success rates, up to 28% of patients are dissatisfied with the outcome.This best-evidence synthesis aimed to review studies with different forms of study design and methodology that examined the relationship between (fulfilment of) outcome expectations of hip and knee patients and satisfaction with outcome.A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Cochrane, and Google Scholar to identify studies conducted up to November 2017. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.In this best-evidence synthesis systematic review, the following main results could be seen. In only half of all studies were preoperative expectations associated with level of satisfaction, while in almost all studies (93%), fulfilment of expectations was related to satisfaction. The effect of met expectations did not differ between hip and knee patients or study design.Fulfilment of expectations seems to be consistently associated with patient satisfaction with outcome. Emphasis in future research must be placed on the operationalization and measurement of expectations and satisfaction to determine the (strength of the) influence of these different forms of assessment on the (existence of the) relationship. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:226-240. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190015.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Policy_brief / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Implementation_research / Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: EFORT Open Rev Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Policy_brief / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Implementation_research / Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: EFORT Open Rev Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido