Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multimodal feature binding in object memory retrieval using event-related potentials: Implications for models of semantic memory.
Chiang, Hsueh-Sheng; Spence, Jeffrey S; Eroh, Justin T; Maguire, Mandy J; Kraut, Michael A; Hart, John.
Afiliación
  • Chiang HS; Department of Neurology and Neuratherapeutics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. Electronic address: hschiang@utdallas.edu.
  • Spence JS; Center for BrainHealth, The University of Texas at Dallas, 2200 West Mockingbird Lane, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
  • Eroh JT; Callier Center for Communication Disorders, The University of Texas at Dallas, 1966 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
  • Maguire MJ; Callier Center for Communication Disorders, The University of Texas at Dallas, 1966 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
  • Kraut MA; Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
  • Hart J; Department of Neurology and Neuratherapeutics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Callier Center for Communication Disorders, The University of Texas at Dallas, 1966 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Int J Psychophysiol ; 153: 116-126, 2020 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32389620
ABSTRACT
To test the hypothesis that semantic processes are represented in multiple subsystems, we recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) as we elicited object memories using the modified Semantic Object Retrieval Test, during which an object feature, presented as a visual word [VW], an auditory word [AW], or a picture [Pic], was followed by a second feature always presented as a visual word. We performed both hypothesis-driven and data-driven analyses using event-related potentials (ERPs) time locked to the second stimulus. We replicated a previously reported left fronto-temporal ERP effect (750-1000 ms post-stimulus) in the VW task, and also found that this ERP component was only present during object memory retrieval in verbal (VW, AW) as opposed to non-verbal (Pic) stimulus types. We also found a right temporal ERP effect (850-1000 ms post-stimulus) that was present in auditory (AW) but not in visual (VW, Pic) stimulus types. In addition, we found an earlier left temporo-parietal ERP effect between 350 and 700 ms post-stimulus and a later midline parietal ERP effect between 700 and 1100 ms post-stimulus, present in all stimulus types, suggesting common neural mechanisms for object retrieval processes and object activation, respectively. These findings support multiple semantic subsystems that respond to varying stimulus modalities, and argue against an ultimate unitary amodal semantic analysis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos / Desempeño Psicomotor / Lectura / Recuerdo Mental / Percepción del Habla / Corteza Cerebral / Potenciales Evocados Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Psychophysiol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos / Desempeño Psicomotor / Lectura / Recuerdo Mental / Percepción del Habla / Corteza Cerebral / Potenciales Evocados Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Psychophysiol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article