Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of female sexual function and sexual function of their partners between groups of pregnant and non-pregnant women.
Angin, Ali Dogukan; Özkaya, Enis; Çetin, Mehtap; Gün, Ismet; Sakin, Onder; Ertekin, Lokman Tekin; Denizli, Ramazan; Koyuncu, Kazibe; Akalin, Emine Eda.
Afiliación
  • Angin AD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. dralidogukan@gmail.com.
  • Özkaya E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Zeynep Kamil Women and Children's Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Çetin M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Burhaniye State Hospital, Balikesir, Turkey.
  • Gün I; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Near East University, Faculty of Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus.
  • Sakin O; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Ertekin LT; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Denizli R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Koyuncu K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Akalin EE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ginekol Pol ; 91(5): 235-239, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32495927
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the female sexual function index and sexual function of their partners between groups of pregnant and non-pregnant Turkish women. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

This was a cross-sectional study of 321 women, including 252 healthy pregnant and 69 healthy nonpregnant women. Assessment of female sexual function index (FSFI), ARIZONA scores of their partners were compared in relation to some of the sociodemographic characteristics and pregnancy trimesters.

RESULTS:

Comparison of the groups revealed a significantly higher FSFI score in the non-pregnant group whereas the ARIZONA score was significantly higher in the pregnant group (p < 0.001). Age, gravidity, parity and smoking rate adjusted mean differences of scores remained statistically significant (p < 0.001). Higher ARIZONA (> 11) score rate was significantly higher in pregnant groups (55.6% vs 23.2%, p < 0.001). Pregnancy was a risk factor for high ARIZONA score [OR 4.1 (95% CI 2.2-7.6, p < 0.001)]. Lower FSFI score rate was significantly higher in the pregnant group (26.4% vs 69.4%, p < 0.001). Pregnancy was a risk factor for low FSFI score [OR 6.4 (95% CI 3.5-11.7, p < 0.001)].

CONCLUSIONS:

Both female sexual function index and ARIZONA scores of their partners were found to be significantly different between groups of pregnant and nonpregnant Turkish women which indicated altered sexual function of couples during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones del Embarazo / Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas / Parejas Sexuales / Mujeres Embarazadas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Ginekol Pol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones del Embarazo / Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas / Parejas Sexuales / Mujeres Embarazadas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Ginekol Pol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía