Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In vivo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty contact mechanics.
Van de Kleut, Madeleine L; Nair, Chaithanya; Milner, Jaques S; Holdsworth, David W; Athwal, George S; Teeter, Matthew G.
Afiliación
  • Van de Kleut ML; Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada. Electronic address: mvandekl@uwo.ca.
  • Nair C; Faculty of Science, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Milner JS; Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.
  • Holdsworth DW; Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Athwal GS; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Teeter MG; Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Roth|McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, Departm
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 30(2): 421-429, 2021 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32580021
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Several in vitro studies have investigated the biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA); however, few in vivo studies exist. The purpose of this study was to examine in vivo RTSA contact mechanics in clinically relevant arm positions. Our hypothesis was that contact would preferentially occur in the inferior region of the polyethylene liner.

METHODS:

Forty patients receiving a primary RTSA were recruited for a prospective cohort study. All patients received the same implant design with a nonretentive liner. Stereo radiographs were taken at maximal active range of motion. Model-based radiostereometric analysis was used to identify implant position. Contact area between the polyethylene and glenosphere was measured as the geometric intersection of the 2 components and compared with respect to polyethylene liner size, arm position, and relative position within the liner.

RESULTS:

There were no differences in the proportion of contact area in any arm position between polyethylene liner sizes, ranging from 30% ± 17% to 38% ± 23% for 36-mm liners and 32% ± 21% to 41% ± 25% for 42-mm liners. Contact was equally distributed between the superior and inferior halves of the liner at each arm position (P = .06-.79); however, greater contact area was observed in the outer radius of the liner when the arm was flexed (P = .002).

CONCLUSION:

This study highlights that contact mechanics are similar between 36- and 42-mm liners. Contact area is generally equally distributed throughout the liner across the range of motion and not preferentially in the inferior region as hypothesized.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación del Hombro / Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Articulación del Hombro / Artroplastía de Reemplazo de Hombro Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA