Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Temporal trends in the number of men electing for conservative management for low-risk prostate cancer in the United States.
Al Hussein Al Awamlh, Bashir; Ballman, Karla V; Ma, Xiaoyue; Hu, Jim C; Shoag, Jonathan E.
Afiliación
  • Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ballman KV; Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ma X; Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Hu JC; Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Shoag JE; Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA. jes9171@med.cornell.edu.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 23(4): 714-717, 2020 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32661433
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Concurrent with the decrease in the number of men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa), the proportion of men with low-risk PCa managed conservatively (active surveillance or watchful waiting) has increased in the United States. We aimed to determine whether this increase is a result of more men being managed conservatively or rather a higher proportion of the diminishing number of low-risk PCa managed this way.

METHODS:

The SEER "Prostate Watchful Waiting Database" identified men managed initially with conservative management between 2010 and 2016. Men > 40 years old who were diagnosed with low-risk (Gleason score 3 + 3, T1-T2a, PSA level < 10 ng/mL) PCa were included. Age-standardized and age-specific PCa incidence and conservative management rates were calculated per 100,000 man-years. The annual percent change in rates for the entire time period was also calculated.

RESULTS:

The incidence of low-risk PCa declined by 11.8% per year (95% confidence interval [CI] -15.4% to -8.0%), whereas the number of men assigned to conservative management for low-risk disease did not increase significantly, rising by +3.7% per year (95% CI -0.7% to 8.4%). In age-specific analysis, the number of men < 60 years and those who were 60-69 years managed conservatively increased by +9.6% per year (95% CI 2.7% to 16.9%) and 4.5% per year (95% CI 0.1% to 9.1%), respectively, whereas the number of men ≥ 70 years electing conservative management remained stable at -4% per year (95% CI -11.2% to 3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The number of men electing conservative management has remained largely stable between 2010 and 2016, despite an increase in the proportion of low-risk PCa managed in this manner.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Espera Vigilante / Tratamiento Conservador Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Espera Vigilante / Tratamiento Conservador Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos