Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance Differences Between the Arched and Flat Bench Press in Beginner and Experienced Paralympic Powerlifters.
Ribeiro Neto, Frederico; Dorneles, Jefferson R; Luna, Rafael M; Spina, Murilo A; Gonçalves, Carlos W; Gomes Costa, Rodrigo R.
Afiliación
  • Ribeiro Neto F; Paralympic Sports Program, SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasilia, Brazil.
  • Dorneles JR; Paralympic Sports Program, SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasilia, Brazil.
  • Luna RM; Brazilian Olympic Commitee, São Paulo, Brazil ; and.
  • Spina MA; Brazilian Olympic Commitee, São Paulo, Brazil ; and.
  • Gonçalves CW; São Paulo Federal University, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Gomes Costa RR; Paralympic Sports Program, SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Brasilia, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res ; 36(7): 1936-1943, 2022 Jul 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740285
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Neto, FR, Dorneles, JR, Luna, RM, Spina, MA, Gonçalves, CW, and Gomes Costa, RR. Performance differences between the arched and flat bench press in beginner and experienced Paralympic powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res 36(7) 1936-1943, 2022-The present study aimed to verify the differences of the total load, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell between the arched and flat techniques of the bench press in beginner (BG) and experienced (EG) Paralympic powerlifters. Twenty beginners (age 34.4 years; experience 3.3 months) and 23 experienced (age 35.5 years; experience 9.8 months) Paralympic powerlifters were selected from a Rehabilitation Hospital Network and a Paralympic sports center. Subjects were assessed in the one-maximum repetition test of the bench press exercise using the flat and arched bench press techniques (48-72-hour interval between sessions). Maximum strength, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell were measured to compare the techniques and the groups. The total load corrected with the Haleczko formula was significantly higher in EG compared with BG (∆ = 21.1%; effect sizes [ES] = 0.39, p ≤ 0.05). There were no significant differences for all analyzed outcomes comparing the arched and flat techniques. During the eccentric phase of the bench press, all assessed differences ranged from -16.6 to 23.1% and presented ES of trivial to moderate. On the concentric phase, the assessed differences ranged from -20.7 to 13.9% and presented ES of trivial to moderate. The total load, trajectory of the barbell in the sagittal plane, and mean velocity of the barbell were not significantly different between the arched and flat techniques for experienced and beginner powerlifting athletes during both the eccentric and concentric phase of the movement. However, further analyses are essential to determine the best technique for athletes.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Levantamiento de Peso / Entrenamiento de Fuerza Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Strength Cond Res Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Levantamiento de Peso / Entrenamiento de Fuerza Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Strength Cond Res Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA