Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Skin Excursion with Cannula Lipodissection and the Anatomical Implications of Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Movement in the Tumescent Face Lift.
Mirzabeigi, Michael N; Stark, Ran Y; Chang, Catherine S; Weissler, Jason M; Carney, Martin J; Bucky, Louis P.
Afiliación
  • Mirzabeigi MN; From Atlanta Plastic Surgery P.C.; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System.
  • Stark RY; From Atlanta Plastic Surgery P.C.; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System.
  • Chang CS; From Atlanta Plastic Surgery P.C.; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System.
  • Weissler JM; From Atlanta Plastic Surgery P.C.; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System.
  • Carney MJ; From Atlanta Plastic Surgery P.C.; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System.
  • Bucky LP; From Atlanta Plastic Surgery P.C.; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 146(2): 269-276, 2020 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740573
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The tumescent face lift uses the concept of subcutaneous cannula lipodissection of the neck, as opposed to wide skin undermining. Lipodissection mobilizes soft tissue while preserving perforating neurovascular branches. The purpose of this study is two-fold (1) to compare the skin recruitment with subcutaneous lipodissection of the neck alone versus wide undermining and (2) to examine the effect of superiorly oriented superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) movement on jowl excursion in the tumescent face lift.

METHODS:

A cadaveric study was performed on five fresh tissue cadavers. Postauricular skin excursion was measured following subcutaneous lipodissection and then measured again after traditional, wide undermining of the neck skin. Jowl excursion (in reference to the mandibular border) was measured following superiorly oriented SMAS excursion. An electronic force gauge was used to measure force application during measurements.

RESULTS:

Cannula lipodissection resulted in a mean skin excursion of 41.9 mm. There was no significant difference in skin excursion compared to wide undermining (41.9 mm versus 42.1 mm; p = 0.785). Jowl position, in reference to the mandibular border, moved superiorly by a mean distance of 18.3 mm with vertical SMAS excursion.

CONCLUSIONS:

Subcutaneous cannula lipodissection results in equivalent skin recruitment in comparison to wide undermining of the neck. A superior vector of pull on the SMAS results in vertical excursion of the jowl in reference to the mandibular border.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colgajos Quirúrgicos / Ritidoplastia / Tejido Subcutáneo / Sistema Músculo-Aponeurótico Superficial Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Colgajos Quirúrgicos / Ritidoplastia / Tejido Subcutáneo / Sistema Músculo-Aponeurótico Superficial Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article