Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving and eating when using a control method that minimizes guessing of the real vs. control condition.
Stevens, Carl E; Lausen, Marissa A; Wagstaff, Laura E; McRae, Tommy R; Pittman, Bethany R; Amthor, Franklin R; Boggiano, Mary M.
Afiliación
  • Stevens CE; Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 415 Campbell Hall, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA.
  • Lausen MA; Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 415 Campbell Hall, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA.
  • Wagstaff LE; Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 415 Campbell Hall, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA.
  • McRae TR; Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 415 Campbell Hall, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA.
  • Pittman BR; Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 415 Campbell Hall, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA.
  • Amthor FR; Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 415 Campbell Hall, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA.
  • Boggiano MM; Department of Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 415 Campbell Hall, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, USA. boggiano@uab.edu.
Eat Weight Disord ; 26(5): 1669-1674, 2021 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748372
PURPOSE: Validation of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to treat obesity is hampered by evidence that participants can distinguish real from the traditional-control condition. Correctly guessing the real condition precludes knowing if it is neuromodulation or expectation that suppresses food craving and eating. Therefore, this study tested the putative efficacy of tDCS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) to reduce food craving and eating when an alternative control condition was used that would be difficult to distinguish from the real condition. METHODS: N = 28 adults with a 26-50 BMI range received a typical 20-min 2 mA current session of tDCS targeting the DLPFC as the real condition and a same duration/current tDCS session targeting the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), a region not expected to affect appetite, as the control. Food image craving ratings, in-lab food consumption, and momentary ratings of physical sensations were measured. RESULTS: DLPFC failed to reduce food craving and consumption compared to SMC stimulation. When interviewed, 71% of participants were unable to guess real from control conditions. Those who guessed DLPFC tDCS as real attributed their guess to increased number and frequency of sensations. However, their sensation ratings during tDCS did not differ between conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The results question if tDCS suppresses craving and eating at all, or if the DLPFC is the best target to do so. The results also indicate that alternate-site constant stimulation as the control method may strengthen the scientific evaluation of tDCS to treat obesity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, experimental study.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eat Weight Disord Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / METABOLISMO Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eat Weight Disord Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / METABOLISMO Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania