Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation or airway pressure release ventilation on children with acute respiratory distress syndrome as a rescue therapy.
Ning, Botao; Liang, Lingfang; Lyu, Yi; Yu, Ying; Li, Biru.
Afiliación
  • Ning B; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Shanghai Children's Medical Center affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Liang L; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Lyu Y; Department of Anesthesia, Minhang Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Yu Y; Department of Anesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
  • Li B; Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Shanghai Children's Medical Center affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Transl Pediatr ; 9(3): 213-220, 2020 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32775239
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To investigate the effects of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) or airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) as a rescue therapy on children with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS:

We retrospectively enrolled 47 children with ARDS who were transitioned from synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) to either HFOV or APRV for 48 h or longer after failure of SIMV. The parameters of demographic data, arterial blood gases, ventilator settings, oxygenation index (OI), and PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio during the first 48 h of HFOV and APRV were recorded.

RESULTS:

There was no significant difference between the HFOV and APRV groups with survival rates of 60% and 72.7%, respectively. Compared to pre-transition, the mean airway pressures at 2 and 48 h after transition were higher in both groups (P<0.01), and the PF ratio at 2 and 48 h in both modes was significantly improved (P<0.001). PF ratio and PaCO2 have significant differences at 48 h between two groups. The OI at 2 h after transition had no improvement in either group and was substantially lower at 48 h relative to the pre-transition level (P<0.001) in both groups. At 48 h after the transition to both HFOV and APRV, the survivors had lower mean airway pressures, higher PF ratios, and a lower OIs than non-survivors (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no significant difference on the survival rates of HFOV and APRV application as a rescue therapy for ARDS, but improved oxygenation at 48 h reliably discriminated survivors from non-survivors in both groups.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Transl Pediatr Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Transl Pediatr Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China