Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety, pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of PIPAC paclitaxel in a swine model.
Tan, Hon Lyn; Kim, Guowei; Charles, Christopher John; Li, Renee R; Jang, Clarisse Jm; Shabbir, Asim; Chue, Koy Min; Tai, Chia Hui; Sundar, Raghav; Goh, Boon Cher; Bonney, Glenn Kunnath; Looi, Wen Donq; Cheow, Esther Sh; So, Jimmy By; Wang, Lingzhi; Yong, Wei Peng.
Afiliación
  • Tan HL; National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Kim G; National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore; University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Charles CJ; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular Research Institute (CVRI), National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
  • Li RR; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cardiovascular Research Institute (CVRI), National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
  • Jang CJ; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Shabbir A; National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore; University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Chue KM; University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Tai CH; University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Sundar R; National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Goh BC; National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Bonney GK; University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Institute for Health Innovation and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Looi WD; Bruker Daltonics, Bruker Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore.
  • Cheow ES; Institute for Health Innovation and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • So JB; National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore; University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: sursbyj@nus.edu.sg.
  • Wang L; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Yong WP; National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(5): 1124-1131, 2021 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800400
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is difficult to treat. Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosolised Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel method of delivering chemotherapy to the peritoneal cavity, aiming for homogenous and deeper drug distribution. To date, limited chemotherapeutics have been used with promising results. Here, we evaluate the pharmacokinetics, peritoneal tissue drug concentration, penetration, and short-term safety of PIPAC using solvent-based paclitaxel in swine to guide clinical trials. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

PIPAC solvent-based paclitaxel was administered at 60, 30, and 15mg/m2 for 3 cohorts. Each PIPAC procedure was followed by intravenous (IV) administration of the same dose of solvent-based paclitaxel on Day 7, serving as control for pharmacokinetic comparison in the same pig. Safety and toxicity were evaluated by clinical assessment, blood counts and biochemistry. Blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis. Peritoneal biopsies were taken to measure tissue paclitaxel concentrations and distribution.

RESULTS:

12 Yorkshire x Landrace pigs underwent trial procedures. With PIPAC, there was linear pharmacokinetics and lower systemic exposure to paclitaxel compared to IV administration. MALDI-MSI demonstrated concentration of paclitaxel at the peritoneal surface, with estimated 2 mm penetration. PIPAC paclitaxel had favorable toxicity profile. The most significant adverse event was neutropenia which was dose dependent, with absolute neutrophil count <1.0 × 103/µL seen at the highest dose. One pig developed grade 2 hypersensitivity reaction during IV infusion and one death occurred during the PIPAC procedure, likely from anaphylaxis; these are known potential adverse events mandating standard precautions and monitoring.

CONCLUSION:

PIPAC paclitaxel at 15mg/m2 may be considered for a Phase I study.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Peritoneales / Paclitaxel / Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Singapur

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Peritoneales / Paclitaxel / Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Singapur
...