Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Operable Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines.
Anker, Christopher J; Dragovic, Jadranka; Herman, Joseph M; Bianchi, Nancy A; Goodman, Karyn A; Jones, William E; Kennedy, Timothy J; Kumar, Rachit; Lee, Percy; Russo, Suzanne; Sharma, Navesh; Small, William; Suh, W Warren; Tchelebi, Leila T; Jabbour, Salma K.
Afiliación
  • Anker CJ; Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont. Electronic address: chris.anker@uvmhealth.org.
  • Dragovic J; Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Herman JM; Department of Radiation Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, New York.
  • Bianchi NA; Department of Reference and Education, Dana Medical Library, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
  • Goodman KA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York.
  • Jones WE; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Kennedy TJ; Department of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
  • Kumar R; Division of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona.
  • Lee P; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Russo S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Sharma N; Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
  • Small W; Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, Illinois.
  • Suh WW; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Ridley-Tree Cancer Center, Santa Barbara, California.
  • Tchelebi LT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
  • Jabbour SK; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 109(1): 186-200, 2021 01 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32858113
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options for nonmetastatic, operable patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). In this systematic review, the American Radium Society (ARS) gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) evaluating how neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment regimens compared with each other, surgery alone, or definitive chemoradiation in terms of response to therapy, quality of life, and oncologic outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was used to develop an extensive analysis of peer-reviewed phase 2R and phase 3 randomized controlled trials as well as meta-analyses found within the Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central, and Embase databases between 2009 to 2019. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 4 broadly representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi).

RESULTS:

For a medically operable nonmetastatic patient with a cT3 and/or cN+ adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or GEJ (Siewert I-II), the panel most strongly recommends neoadjuvant chemoradiation. For a cT2N0M0 patient with high-risk features, the panel recommends neoadjuvant chemoradiation as usually appropriate. For patients found to have pathologically involved nodes (pN+) who did not receive any neoadjuvant therapy, the panel recommends adjuvant chemoradiation as usually appropriate. These guidelines assess the appropriateness of various dose-fractionating schemes and target volumes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Chemotherapy and/or radiation regimens for esophageal cancer are still evolving with many areas of active investigation. These guidelines are intended for the use of practitioners and patients who desire information about the management of operable esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sociedades Científicas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Unión Esofagogástrica / Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sociedades Científicas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Unión Esofagogástrica / Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article