Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How can technology support quality improvement? Lessons learned from the adoption of an analytics tool for advanced performance measurement in a hospital unit.
Tolf, Sara; Mesterton, Johan; Söderberg, Daniel; Amer-Wåhlin, Isis; Mazzocato, Pamela.
Afiliación
  • Tolf S; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. sara.tolf@ki.se.
  • Mesterton J; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Söderberg D; Ivbar Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Amer-Wåhlin I; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Mazzocato P; Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 816, 2020 Sep 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32873286
BACKGROUND: Technology for timely feedback of data has the potential to support quality improvement (QI) in health care. However, such technology may pose difficulties stemming from the complex interaction with the setting in which it is implemented. To enable professionals to use data in QI there is a need to better understand of how to handle this complexity. This study aims to explore factors that influence the adoption of a technology-supported QI programme in an obstetric unit through a complexity informed framework. METHODS: This qualitative study, based on focus group interviews, was conducted at a Swedish university hospital's obstetric unit, which used an analytics tool for advanced performance measurement that gave timely and case mix adjusted feedback of performance data to support QI. Data was collected through three focus group interviews conducted with 16 managers and staff. The Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework guided the data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Staff and managers deemed the technology to effectively support ongoing QI efforts by providing timely access to reliable data. The value of the technology was associated with a clear need to make better use of existing data in QI. The data and the methodology in the analytics tool reflected the complexity of the clinical conditions treated but was presented through an interface that was easy to access and user friendly. However, prior understanding of statistics was helpful to be able to fully grasp the presented data. The tool was adapted to the needs and the organizational conditions of the local setting through a collaborative approach between the technology supplier and the adopters. CONCLUSIONS: Technology has the potential to enable systematic QI through motivating professionals by providing timely and adequate feedback of performance. The adoption of such technology is complex and requires openness for gradual learning and improvement.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tecnología / Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Unidades Hospitalarias Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tecnología / Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Unidades Hospitalarias Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Reino Unido