Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gastrointestinal malignancies and supportive care trials: a snapshot of the last two decades.
Kouzy, Ramez; Abi Jaoude, Joseph; Minsky, Bruce D; Das, Prajnan; Koong, Albert C; Subbiah, Ishwaria M; Ludmir, Ethan B; Taniguchi, Cullen M.
Afiliación
  • Kouzy R; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Abi Jaoude J; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Minsky BD; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Das P; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Koong AC; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Subbiah IM; Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Ludmir EB; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Taniguchi CM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA ctaniguchi@mdanderson.org.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 12(1): 42-45, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32943466
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers experience a high symptom burden due to the effects of both cancer and treatment. As such, trials assessing symptom burden and supportive interventions are crucial. Here, we characterise the landscape of phase III GI cancer clinical trials and explore study outcomes centred on the patient's quality of life (QoL).

METHODS:

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) registered between 2000 and 2017 that are assessing a therapeutic intervention in adult patients with cancer and grouped trials by GI disease sites.

RESULTS:

Overall, we identified 76 phase III trials specific to GI cancers that enrolled a total of 53 725 patients. When analysing the primary outcomes measured, the vast majority of studies (n=71, 86%) measured disease-related endpoints such as progression-free survival or overall survival. All trials had a secondary endpoint that measured adverse events, but only 30 trials (39%) included QoL measures as secondary endpoints. Of the 30 trials that included QoL secondary endpoints, only 16 (53%) reported these results. Only five trials (7%) assessed interventions aimed at supportive measures impacting disease-related or treatment-related toxicity. None of the supportive trials included QoL as a primary endpoint and only two of these trials (40%) included QoL as a secondary endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS:

Most GI cancer trials failed to incorporate patient-centred outcomes or QoL measures when studying new interventions. These findings call for greater integration of patient-reported metrics, which may lead to better care and outcomes for patients with GI malignancies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gastrointestinales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gastrointestinales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: ENGLAND / ESCOCIA / GB / GREAT BRITAIN / INGLATERRA / REINO UNIDO / SCOTLAND / UK / UNITED KINGDOM