Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Different Timings of Implant Insertion on the Bone Remodeling Volume around Patients' Maxillary Single Implants: A 2-3 Years Follow-Up.
Menchini-Fabris, Giovanni Battista; Toti, Paolo; Crespi, Giovanni; Covani, Ugo; Furlotti, Luca; Crespi, Roberto.
Afiliación
  • Menchini-Fabris GB; Department of Multidisciplinary Regenerative Research, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Vittoria Colonna, 11, 00193 Rome, Italy.
  • Toti P; San Rossore Dental Unit, Viale delle Cascine 152 San Rossore, 56122 Pisa, Italy.
  • Crespi G; Department of Multidisciplinary Regenerative Research, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Vittoria Colonna, 11, 00193 Rome, Italy.
  • Covani U; Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatological Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042 Forte Dei Marmi, Italy.
  • Furlotti L; Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatological Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042 Forte Dei Marmi, Italy.
  • Crespi R; Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatological Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042 Forte Dei Marmi, Italy.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32957683
ABSTRACT

Background:

To investigate the middle-term effect on bone remodeling of different timings for different implant placement (immediate versus delayed).

Methods:

Patients with an anterior maxillary failing tooth were treated by single-crown supported by dental implant. Subjects were retrospectively analyzed for 3 years and assigned to one of two predictor groups nine immediate versus 10 delayed implant placement (1-2 months after tooth extraction). The crestal bone loss around dental implants was measured with the cone beam computerized tomography by fusing pre-operative and post-operative data.

Results:

The percentage of volume loss registered at 1-year follow-up (%ΔV) was of 7.5% for the immediate group, which was significantly lower (p-values ≤ 0.0002) than the loss of 24.2% for the delayed group. At 3 years, there was a significant difference (p-values = 0.0291) between the two groups, respectively, with a volume loss of 14.6% and 27.1%. When different times were compared, the percentage of the volume loss for the immediate group was different (p-value = 0.0366) between the first and third year (7.5% and 14.6%, respectively). For the delayed group, no significant difference was registered between the 1- and 3-year follow-up.

Conclusions:

The bone loss around dental implant-supported single-crown with different timing of insertion appeared higher for the delayed group than the immediate group.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar / Remodelación Ósea / Carga Inmediata del Implante Dental Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pérdida de Hueso Alveolar / Remodelación Ósea / Carga Inmediata del Implante Dental Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int J Environ Res Public Health Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia
...