Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
From QAAPAPLE 1 to QAAPAPLE 2: how do we move from one algorithm to another one with Long Acting Antipsychotics (LAIs).
Stip, Emmanuel; Grignon, Sylvain; Roy, Marc André; Bloom, David; Osman, Ossama; Amiri, Leena; Abdel Aziz, Karim; Javaid, Syed Fahad; Arnone, Danilo.
Afiliación
  • Stip E; College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
  • Grignon S; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal (CHUM), Institute Universitaireen Santé Mentale de Montréal, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
  • Roy MA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
  • Bloom D; Department of Psychiatry, University of Laval , Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Osman O; Department of Psychiatry, University of Laval , Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Amiri L; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University , Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Abdel Aziz K; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University , Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Javaid SF; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, the University of Texas Health Science Center , Texas, USA.
  • Arnone D; College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University , Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 20(12): 1325-1332, 2020 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32962466
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2011, the authors published an algorithm summarizing practice guidelines related to the use of long-acting antipsychotics (LAIs) called the Québec Algorithme Antipsychotique à Action Prolongée (QAAPAPLE), and proposed that it be revised every 5-10 years to update it according to most recent scientific knowledge. Therefore, a re-evaluation of the algorithm was conducted to determine which recommendations were still relevant and which needed modification.

METHODS:

The authors conducted a two-fold

approach:

a review of the literature to include new evidence since 2011 (controlled trials, meta-analyses, and practice guidelines); and a participatory component involving electronic surveys, conferences, encounters with opinion leadres, and patients' representatives.

RESULTS:

Overall, prescribers tended to make decisions based on personal experience and conversations with colleagues rather than consulting evidence-based guidelines. To test if the algorithm was useful worldwide, it was presented in the United Arab Emirates, where the feedback was in agreement with the algorithm and its limitations.

CONCLUSIONS:

Since its initial publication, the QAAPAPLE algorithm has been updated to guide clinicians on the use of LAIs. The new algorithm has also been assessed outside Canada to test its generalizability worldwide, and indicated its flexibility, efficiency, and user-friendliness in order to guide clinicians on the use of LAIs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Psicóticos / Antipsicóticos / Algoritmos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Expert Rev Neurother Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Emiratos Árabes Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos Psicóticos / Antipsicóticos / Algoritmos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Expert Rev Neurother Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Emiratos Árabes Unidos