Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differentiated timing of induction for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy-A historical cohort study.
Nielsen, Julie Helmer; Lykke, Jacob Alexander.
Afiliación
  • Nielsen JH; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Lykke JA; Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(2): 279-285, 2021 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32970824
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy-specific liver disease characterized by pruritus and abnormal liver function tests and it has been associated with intrauterine fetal distress and stillbirth. We compared two guidelines of the management of ICP one mandating induction at 38 weeks of gestation (Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital before 2012) and another separating ICP into mild and severe forms, and only women with severe ICP were recommended for induction at 38 weeks (Hvidovre Hospital after 2012). MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

We performed a historical cohort study at two Copenhagen Hospitals from 2004 to 2015. We included 62 937 women with singleton deliveries at Rigshospitalet and 71 015 at Hvidovre Hospital, of whom 971 women (1.5%) and 998 women (1.4%) were diagnosed with ICP at Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, respectively. Data were retrieved from a local medical database. For the analysis of induction and comparison of obstetrical outcomes we only included pregnancies with an ICP diagnosis and excluded women with other medical conditions that could mandate induction. Main outcome measures were induction and cesarean section rates, asphyxia and stillbirth.

RESULTS:

We found no changes in the rate of spontaneous labor, cesarean section and induction over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .17) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .38). For women with intended vaginal delivery we found no change in the final mode of delivery over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .28) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .57).

CONCLUSIONS:

The two approaches to the management of mild ICP regarding the timing of induction are comparable. Women with mild ICP and their clinicians should be encouraged to engage in shared decision-making when discussing timing of induction.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones del Embarazo / Colestasis Intrahepática / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Trabajo de Parto Inducido Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones del Embarazo / Colestasis Intrahepática / Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto / Trabajo de Parto Inducido Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca