Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detection of vertebral fracture in an acute hospital setting: an intervention to reduce future fracture risk through fracture liaison service intervention?
Toal, Michael; McLoughlin, Connor; Pierce, Nicole; Moss, Julie; English, Sarah; Lindsay, John R.
Afiliación
  • Toal M; Mater Infirmorum Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  • McLoughlin C; Mater Infirmorum Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  • Pierce N; Mater Infirmorum Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  • Moss J; Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  • English S; Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
  • Lindsay JR; Mater Infirmorum Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland. johnr.lindsay@belfasttrust.hscni.net.
Arch Osteoporos ; 15(1): 160, 2020 10 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040188
ABSTRACT
We introduced a standardised reporting system in the radiology department to highlight vertebral fractures and to signpost fracture prevention services. Our quality improvement project achieved improved fracture reporting, access to the FLS service, bone density assessment and anti-fracture treatment.

PURPOSE:

Identification of vertebral fragility fractures (VF) provides an opportunity to identify individuals at high risk who might benefit from secondary fracture prevention. We sought to standardise VF reporting and to signpost fracture prevention services. Our aim was to improve rates of VF detection and access to our fracture liaison service (FLS).

METHODS:

We introduced a standardised reporting tool within the radiology department to flag VFs with signposting for referral for bone densitometry (DXA) and osteoporosis assessment in line with Royal Osteoporosis Society guidelines. We monitored uptake of VF reporting during a quality improvement phase and case identification within the FLS service.

RESULTS:

Recruitment of individuals with VF to the FLS service increased from a baseline of 63 cases in 2017 (6%) to 95 (8%) in 2018 and 157 (8%) in 2019 and to 102 (12%) in the first 6 months of 2020 (p = 0.001). One hundred fifty-three patients with VFs were identified during the QI period (56 males; 97 females). Use of the terminology 'fracture' increased to 100% (mean age 70 years; SD 13) in computed tomography (n = 110), plain X-ray (n = 37) or magnetic resonance imaging (n = 6) reports within the cohort. Signposting to DXA and osteoporosis assessment was included in all reports (100%). DXA was arranged for 103/153; 12 failed to attend. Diagnostic categories were osteoporosis (31%), osteopenia (36%) or normal bone density (33%). A new prescription for bone protection therapy was issued in 63/153. Twelve of the series died during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS:

Standardisation of radiology reporting systems facilitates reporting of prevalent vertebral fractures and supports secondary fracture prevention strategies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Servicio de Radiología en Hospital / Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral / Fracturas Osteoporóticas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch Osteoporos Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Osteoporosis / Servicio de Radiología en Hospital / Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral / Fracturas Osteoporóticas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arch Osteoporos Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article