Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pathogenic Detection by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Osteoarticular Infections.
Huang, Zi-da; Zhang, Zi-Jie; Yang, Bin; Li, Wen-Bo; Zhang, Chong-Jing; Fang, Xin-Yu; Zhang, Chao-Fan; Zhang, Wen-Ming; Lin, Jian-Hua.
Afiliación
  • Huang ZD; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Zhang ZJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Yang B; Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Li WB; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Zhang CJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Fang XY; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Zhang CF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Zhang WM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
  • Lin JH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33042860
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To evaluate metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) as a diagnostic tool in detecting pathogens from osteoarticular infection (OAI) samples.

Methods:

130 samples of joint fluid, sonicate fluid, and tissue were prospectively collected from 92 patients with OAI. The performance of mNGS and microbiology culture was compared pairwise.

Results:

The overall sensitivity of mNGS was 88.5% (115/130), significantly higher than that of microbiological culture, which had a sensitivity of 69.2% (90/130, p < 0.01). Sensitivity was significantly higher for joint fluid (mNGS 86.7% vs. microbiology culture 68.7%, p < 0.01) and sonicate fluid (mNGS 100% vs. microbiology culture 66.7%, p < 0.05) samples. mNGS detected 12 pathogenic strains undetected by microbiological culture. Additional pathogens detected by mNGS were Coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Gram-negative Bacillus, Streptococci, Anaerobe, non-tuberculosis mycobacterium, MTCP (p > 0.05), and Mycoplasma (OR = ∞, 95% confidence interval, 5.12-∞, p < 0.001). Additionally, sensitivity by mNGS was higher in antibiotic-treated samples compared to microbiological culture (89.7 vs. 61.5%, p < 0.01).

Conclusions:

mNGS is a robust diagnostic tool for pathogenic detection in samples from OAI patients, compared to routine cultures. The mNGS technique is particularly valuable to diagnose pathogens that are difficult to be cultured, or to test samples from patients previously treated with antibiotics.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Metagenoma / Metagenómica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: CH / SUIZA / SUÍÇA / SWITZERLAND

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Metagenoma / Metagenómica Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: CH / SUIZA / SUÍÇA / SWITZERLAND