Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does Performance-Related Information Augment the Maximal Isometric Force in the Elbow Flexors?
Miller, William; Jeon, Sunggun; Kang, Minsoo; Song, Jun Seob; Ye, Xin.
Afiliación
  • Miller W; Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Neuromuscular Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, 243A Turner Center University, University, MS, 38677-1848, USA. wmmille2@olemiss.edu.
  • Jeon S; Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Neuromuscular Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, 243A Turner Center University, University, MS, 38677-1848, USA.
  • Kang M; Applied Neuromuscular Physiology Laboratory, Department of Health and Human Performance, School of Kinesiology, Applied Health, and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
  • Song JS; Health and Sport Analytics Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, 38677, USA.
  • Ye X; Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Neuromuscular Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, 243A Turner Center University, University, MS, 38677-1848, USA.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback ; 46(1): 91-101, 2021 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33095393
ABSTRACT
The effects of different feedback conditions on the elbow flexors maximal voluntary isometric (MVIC) force were examined. In a single visit, twenty participants (10 males) were exposed to four conditions including, Visual only; (i.e., knowledge of results [VI]); Verbal encouragement (i.e., verbally stating pull, pull [VE]); VI and VE (VIVE); and no VI or VE (NOVIVE). Three, 5-s MVIC trials were completed for each condition. Separate 2 × 4 (sex × condition) repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine MVIC force, rate of force development (RFD200), and rate of electromyography (EMG) rise (RER200) for the 0-200-ms window. There was a significant main condition effect for MVIC force (p < 0.001). Significantly greater MVIC force was shown for VIVE compared to VE (p < 0.001) and NOVIVE (p = 0.002) conditions, and VI compared to VE (p = 0.011) and NOVIVE (p = 0.009) conditions. A significant sex × condition interaction (p = 0.036) was observed for RFD200, with significantly (p = 0.003) greater RFD200 in males compared to females, in the VI condition only. There were no significant differences in RFD200 among condition for males (p = 0.033) or females (p = 0.194). There was a significant main effect for sex (p = 0.006) for RER200, with significantly greater (p = 0.003) RER200 (conditions merged) in males (mean ± standard deviation (SD) 422.99 ± 124.67%), compared to females (220.68 ± 134.01%). Here we suggest the importance of providing VI feedback alone, or in conjunction with VE, for the measurement of elbow flexion MVIC. Additionally, these results provide a foundational framework for future studies aiming to improve feedback modalities during training or rehabilitation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Codo / Rendimiento Físico Funcional / Contracción Isométrica Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Músculo Esquelético / Codo / Rendimiento Físico Funcional / Contracción Isométrica Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...