Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distribution, side involvement, phenotype and associated anomalies of Korean patients with craniofacial clefts from single university hospitalbased data obtained during 1998-2018.
Chung, Jee Hyeok; Yim, Sunjin; Cho, Il-Sik; Lim, Seung-Weon; Yang, Il-Hyung; Ha, Jeong Hyun; Kim, Sukwha; Baek, Seung-Hak.
Afiliación
  • Chung JH; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yim S; Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Cho IS; Private Practice, Pohang, Korea.
  • Lim SW; Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
  • Yang IH; Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Ha JH; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim S; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Baek SH; Department of Orthodontics, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Orthod ; 50(6): 383-390, 2020 Nov 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33144527
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the distribution, side involvement, phenotype, and associated anomalies of Korean patients with craniofacial clefts (CFC).

METHODS:

The samples consisted of 38 CFC patients, who were treated at Seoul National University Dental Hospital during 1998-2018. The Tessier cleft type, sex, side involvement, phenotype, and associated anomalies were investigated using nonparametric statistical analysis.

RESULTS:

The three most common types were #7 cleft, followed by #0 cleft and #14 cleft. There was no difference between the frequency of male and female. Patients with #0 cleft exhibited nasal deformity, bony defect, and missing teeth in the premaxilla, midline cleft lip, and eye problems. A patient with #3 cleft (unilateral type) exhibited bilateral cleft lip and alveolus. All patients with #4 cleft were the bilateral type, including a combination of #3 and #4 clefts, and had multiple missing teeth. A patient with #5 cleft (unilateral type) had a posterior openbite. In patients with #7 cleft, the unilateral type was more prevalent than the bilateral type (87.0% vs. 13.0%, p < 0.001). Sixteen patients showed hemifacial microsomia (HFM), Goldenhar syndrome, and unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). There was a significant match in the side involvement of #7 cleft and HFM (87.5%, p < 0.01). Patients with #14 cleft had plagiocephaly, UCLP, or hyperterorbitism. A patient with #30 cleft exhibited tongue tie and missing tooth.

CONCLUSIONS:

Due to the diverse associated craniofacial anomalies in patients with CFC, a multidisciplinary approach involving a well-experienced cooperative team is mandatory for these patients.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Korean J Orthod Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Korean J Orthod Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article