Morphology and growth of the pediatric lumbar vertebrae.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The majority of existing literature describing pediatric lumbar vertebral morphology are limited to characterization of the vertebral bodies, pedicles, and spinal canal and no study has described the rates of growth for any lumbar vertebral structure. While it is known that growth of the lumbar vertebrae results in changes in vertebral shape, the dimension ratios used to quantify these shape changes do not represent the 3D morphology of the vertebral structures. Additionally, many of the previous evaluations of growth and shape are purely descriptive and do not investigate sexual dimorphism or variations across vertebral levels. PURPOSE: This study aims to establish a database of pediatric lumbar vertebra dimension, growth, and shape data for subjects between and ages of 1 and 19 years. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of computed tomography (CT) data. METHODS: Retrospective, abdominal, CT scans of 102 skeletally normal pediatric subjects (54 males, 48 females) between the ages of 1 and 19 years were digitally reconstructed and manually segmented. Thirty surface landmark points (LMPs), 30 vertebral measurements, the centroid size, centroid location, and the local orientation were collected for each lumbar vertebra along with the centroid size of the LMPs comprising each subject's full lumbar spine and their intervertebral disc (IVD) heights. Nonparametric statistics were used to compare dimension values across vertebral levels and between sexes. Linear models with age as the independent variable were used to characterize dimension growth for each sex and vertebral level. Age-dependent quadratic equations were fit to LMP distributions resulting from a generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) of the vertebrae and fixed effects models were used to investigate differences in model coefficients across levels and between sexes. RESULTS: Intervertebral level dimension differences were observed across all vertebral structures in both sexes while pedicle widths and IVDs heights were the only measurements found to be sexually dimorphic. Dimension growth rates generally varied across vertebral levels and the growth rates of males were typically larger than those of females. Differences between male and female vertebral shapes were also found for all lumbar vertebral structures. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to report growth rates for the majority of pediatric lumbar vertebral structures and the first to describe the 3D age-dependent shapes of the pediatric lumbar spine and vertebrae. In addition to providing a quantitative database, the dimension, growth, and shape data reported here would have applications in medical device design, surgical planning, surgical training, and biomechanical modeling.