Validating a Patient-Reported Outcomes-Derived Algorithm for Classifying Symptom Complexity Levels Among Patients With Cancer.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw
; 18(11): 1518-1525, 2020 11.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-33152696
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The patient-reported outcomes (PROs) symptom complexity algorithm, derived from self-reported symptom scores using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and concerns indicated on the Canadian Problem Checklist, has not been validated extensively.METHODS:
This is a retrospective chart review study using data from the Alberta Cancer Registry and electronic medical records from Alberta Health Services. The sample includes patients with cancer who visited a cancer facility in Alberta, Canada, from February 2016 through November 2017 (n=1,466).RESULTS:
The effect size (d=1.2) indicates that the magnitude of difference in health status between the severe- and low-complexity groups is large. The symptom complexity algorithm effectively classified subgroups of patients with cancer with distinct health status. Using Karnofsky performance status, the algorithm shows a sensitivity of 70.3%, specificity of 84.1%, positive predictive value of 79.1%, negative predictive value of 76.7%, and accuracy of 77.7%. An area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.824 was found for the complexity algorithm, which is generally regarded as good, This same finding was also regarded as superior to the alternative algorithm generated by 2-step cluster analysis (area under the curve, 0.721).CONCLUSIONS:
The validity of the PRO-derived symptom complexity algorithm is established in this study. The algorithm demonstrated satisfactory accuracy against a clinician-driven complexity assessment and a strong correlation with the known group analysis. Furthermore, the algorithm showed a higher screening capacity compared with the algorithm generated from 2-step cluster analysis, reinforcing the importance of contextualization when classifying patients' symptoms, rather than purely relying on statistical outcomes. The algorithm carries importance in clinical settings, acting as a symptom complexity flag, helping healthcare teams identify which patients may need more timely, targeted, and individualized patient symptom management.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente
/
Neoplasias
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Aspecto:
Patient_preference
Límite:
Humans
País/Región como asunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Natl Compr Canc Netw
Asunto de la revista:
NEOPLASIAS
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Article