Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-time drone derived thermal imagery outperforms traditional survey methods for an arboreal forest mammal.
Witt, Ryan R; Beranek, Chad T; Howell, Lachlan G; Ryan, Shelby A; Clulow, John; Jordan, Neil R; Denholm, Bob; Roff, Adam.
Afiliación
  • Witt RR; School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Beranek CT; FAUNA Research Alliance, Kahibah, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Howell LG; School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ryan SA; FAUNA Research Alliance, Kahibah, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Clulow J; Science Division, NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Jordan NR; School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Denholm B; FAUNA Research Alliance, Kahibah, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Roff A; School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0242204, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196649
ABSTRACT
Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) are cryptic and currently face regional extinction. The direct detection (physical sighting) of individuals is required to improve conservation management strategies. We provide a comparative assessment of three survey methods for the direct detection of koalas systematic spotlighting (Spotlight), remotely piloted aircraft system thermal imaging (RPAS), and the refined diurnal radial search component of the spot assessment technique (SAT). Each survey method was repeated on the same morning with independent observers (0300-1200 hrs) for a total of 10 survey occasions at sites with fixed boundaries (28-76 ha) in Port Stephens (n = 6) and Gilead (n = 1) in New South Wales between May and July 2019. Koalas were directly detected on 22 occasions during 7 of 10 comparative surveys (Spotlight n = 7; RPAS n = 14; and SAT n = 1), for a total of 12 unique individuals (Spotlight n = 4; RPAS n = 11; SAT n = 1). In 3 of 10 comparative surveys no koalas were detected. Detection probability was 38.9 ± 20.03% for Spotlight, 83.3 ± 11.39% for RPAS and 4.2 ± 4.17% for SAT. Effective detectability per site was 1 ± 0.44 koalas per 6.75 ± 1.03 hrs for Spotlight (1 koala per 6.75 hrs), 2 ± 0.38 koalas per 4.35 ± 0.28 hrs for RPAS (1 koala per 2.18 hrs) and 0.14 ± 0.14 per 6.20 ± 0.93 hrs for SAT (1 koala per 43.39 hrs). RPAS thermal imaging technology appears to offer an efficient method to directly survey koalas comparative to Spotlight and SAT and has potential as a valuable conservation tool to inform on-ground management of declining koala populations.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aeronaves / Densidad de Población / Phascolarctidae Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aeronaves / Densidad de Población / Phascolarctidae Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia